A manufacturing facility operates at a loss. A legally and physically feasible residential redevelopment would be worth more, net of demolition and all conversion costs, than the property’s current value as improved. This suggests:
Correct Answer
D) The highest and best use is demolition and redevelopment
The explicit net-value comparison favors demolition and residential redevelopment, assuming the alternative is market-supported and feasible. The operating loss is supporting context, not enough on its own. If the redevelopment value were gross of demolition or development costs, more analysis would be required.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because the stated residential redevelopment produces more value than the current improved use even after demolition and all conversion costs are subtracted. When a feasible, market-supported alternative yields a higher net value, highest and best use points to demolition and redevelopment. Demolition is economically appropriate when the land's value for the better use exceeds the current market value of the improved property.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: The current use is the highest and best use
Option A, that the current use is the highest and best use, conflicts with the facts. A feasible alternative is worth more net of all costs, so the existing manufacturing use is not the maximally productive use.
Option B: The property should be valued as a special purpose property
Option B, valuing the property as a special purpose property, does not answer the question. The issue is which use is highest and best; the facts show a residential alternative with a higher net value, not a need for special purpose treatment.
Option C: The property is functionally obsolete
Option C, that the property is functionally obsolete, labels a possible loss in the improvements but does not state the conclusion the facts support. The net value comparison shows the highest and best use is redevelopment, which is a broader conclusion than functional obsolescence.
Net beats as is
If the alternative's value after demolition and conversion costs beats the value as is, redevelopment is the highest and best use.
How to use: Use this when a question compares an existing improved use with a redevelopment option.
Exam Tip
Check whether the alternative value is stated net of demolition and conversion costs. If it is, and it exceeds the current improved value, redevelopment is the supported answer; if it is gross, more analysis is needed.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Concluding redevelopment is best based only on an operating loss
- -Comparing gross redevelopment value with current value without subtracting demolition and conversion costs
- -Assuming the existing use remains highest and best simply because it is in place
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests highest and best use analysis for an improved property. When a legally permissible, physically possible and feasible alternative use is worth more net of demolition and conversion costs than the property's current value as improved, the existing use is no longer the highest and best use. The operating loss supports that conclusion but is not enough by itself; the net value comparison is what decides it.
Background Knowledge
Highest and best use is the legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive use of a property. For an improved property, the appraiser compares the value of continuing the current use with the value of alternative uses, net of demolition, conversion and development costs. If an alternative wins after all costs, the current improvements may be an interim use or candidates for removal.
Real-World Application
An aging factory near a growing residential area generates losses, and the zoning allows residential use. The appraiser estimates that a residential project, after demolition and all development costs, would produce a higher value than the factory as it stands. The appraiser concludes the highest and best use as improved is demolition and residential redevelopment and explains the supporting analysis.
More Property Description Questions
Market analysis confirms that seller financing at 3%, versus a 6% market rate, increased a comparable sale price. What adjustment removes that financing premium?
At the same effective date, reliable value indications support $800,000 for continued use of a property as improved and $500,000 for its cleared site. Immediate demolition costs $100,000. These are the only feasible alternatives, with no other costs or timing differences. Which alternative has the higher net value?
Other relevant conditions equal, growth in the number of households with effective purchasing power in a market tends to have which effect?
In a lakefront market, paired sales show that direct water frontage has the largest price effect of any feature. Which approach to comparable selection best follows from this evidence?
Which circumstance can cause highest and best use as improved to differ from highest and best use as though vacant?
A small group of buyers in a market looks for specialized features that are uncommon in the broader housing supply. What term describes this group?
A neighborhood analysis should include all of the following EXCEPT:
A site legally permits at most 40 units and can physically support 50. Supported comparable analyses find 30 and 40 units financially feasible, with 40 units producing the highest net land value after costs, timing and required return. Which use is maximally productive among these alternatives?
Market evidence isolates a subject value loss from off-site landfill odors. Which listed cause is an external-obsolescence influence?
Which proposed use cannot pass the legal-permissibility screen without evidence that the necessary permission is reasonably probable?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
A 10-acre site has a maximum FAR of 2.0, counting all floor area in this model. Assume four equal floor plates, with no tighter coverage, setback or other limit. What maximum footprint follows from FAR alone?
Next Question
An eight-month-old sale and a recent sale are both verified competitive substitutes. Market analysis supports the adjustments needed for each. The older sale is more physically similar, while the recent sale needs larger physical adjustments. Which approach uses both relevant observations?