EstatePass
cost-approachhard

A house has no central air in a market where nearly all sales have it. Installing costs $9,000; new construction would include it for $6,000; paired sales show buyers pay $8,000 more with A/C. This deficiency is:

Correct Answer

B) Curable, measured at the $3,000 excess of installing now over building in

Why this is correct: Curability is tested by whether the cost to cure ($9,000) is less than or equal to the value added ($8,000). Here, cost exceeds value by $1,000, making it a close case. The functional penalty is the excess of retrofit cost over new-in cost ($9,000 - $6,000 = $3,000). Why the other choices are wrong: "Curable — the $3,000 excess cost is less than nothing, so cure is automatic" misinterprets; the $3,000 is a penalty, not a reason for automatic cure. "Incurable, since installation exceeds the new-construction figure" is too absolute; the test is cost vs. value added, not just vs. new cost. "Nonexistent, because cost exceeds one contribution estimate" is false; a deficiency exists if market pays less. Exam tip: For curable functional obsolescence, test: Cost to Cure ≤ Value Added.

Answer Options
A
Curable — the $3,000 excess cost is less than nothing, so cure is automatic
B
Curable, measured at the $3,000 excess of installing now over building in
C
Incurable, since installation exceeds the new-construction figure
D
Nonexistent, because cost exceeds one contribution estimate

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Why this is correct: Curability is tested by whether the cost to cure ($9,000) is less than or equal to the value added ($8,000). Here, cost exceeds value by $1,000, making it a close case. The functional penalty is the excess of retrofit cost over new-in cost ($9,000 - $6,000 = $3,000). Why the other choices are wrong: "Curable — the $3,000 excess cost is less than nothing, so cure is automatic" misinterprets; the $3,000 is a penalty, not a reason for automatic cure. "Incurable, since installation exceeds the new-construction figure" is too absolute; the test is cost vs. value added, not just vs. new cost. "Nonexistent, because cost exceeds one contribution estimate" is false; a deficiency exists if market pays less. Exam tip: For curable functional obsolescence, test: Cost to Cure ≤ Value Added.

Was this explanation helpful?

More cost-approach Questions

In a cost approach for a proposed building, the appropriate cost basis is generally:

A 45-year-old office building has undergone multiple high-quality renovations, including HVAC replacement, seismic retrofitting, and full interior modernization. Its functional layout remains competitive with new construction, and it occupies a stable, well-located corridor. The appraiser estimates its total economic life at 70 years. Which estimate of effective age is most supportable under USPAP and recognized cost approach methodology?

A warehouse cost $210,000 to build when the cost index stood at 105. The index is now 210. Its indicated current cost is:

An appraiser is estimating accrued depreciation for a commercial office building using the age-life method. The building was constructed in 1992 and has a total economic life of 60 years. As of the appraisal date in 2024, the appraiser determines the property’s effective age is 36 years due to consistent maintenance, modernized systems, and favorable market perception. What is the percent of accrued depreciation indicated by the age-life method?

Which event would RAISE a building's effective age relative to last year's estimate?

Two identical houses were built the same year; one has been meticulously maintained, the other neglected. Their age-life analyses differ because:

Which statement is MOST consistent with USPAP Standards Rule 6 regarding the identification and treatment of external obsolescence in the cost approach?

A 40-year-old industrial warehouse has undergone no major renovations and suffers from outdated electrical systems, inefficient insulation, and obsolescent loading dock design. Market evidence indicates similar properties typically exhibit functional obsolescence reducing utility by 15% and external obsolescence reducing value by 10%. If the appraiser uses the age-life method with a total economic life of 50 years, how should effective age be adjusted to reflect these conditions?

In developing an age-life depreciation estimate, an appraiser assigns an effective age of 16 years and a total economic life of 40 years. Later, the appraiser discovers that comparable properties in the same submarket have recently sold with effective ages averaging 12 years and total economic lives averaging 45 years — and those sales exhibited superior energy efficiency and adaptive reuse features. What is the appraiser’s USPAP-compliant obligation regarding the original effective age estimate?

The age-life method expresses depreciation as:

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing