A GRM derived from comparables is most reliable when those comparables:
Correct Answer
B) Have similar expense ratios, vacancy and physical character
Why this is correct: A Gross Rent Multiplier (GRM) assumes similar operating characteristics; thus, comparables should have similar expense ratios, vacancy, and physical traits to ensure reliability, as per the original explanation. Why the other choices are wrong: "Sold within the last five years anywhere in the county" is incorrect; geographic and temporal proximity matter. "Are all larger than the subject property being appraised" is wrong; size should be similar. "Were financed with identical loan terms and interest rates" is false; financing is typically not considered in GRM. Exam tip: For GRM, comparables must be operationally similar, not just recent or nearby.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
A multiplier embeds vacancy, expense and physical differences without separating them, so it is reliable only where the comparables share those characteristics with the subject.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Sold within the last five years anywhere in the county
A five-year window across an entire county sacrifices both market timing and locational comparability.
Option C: Are all larger than the subject property being appraised
Size alone does not establish comparability, and systematically larger comparables would bias the multiplier.
Option D: Were financed with identical loan terms and interest rates
Identical financing addresses cash equivalency rather than the relationship between rent and value.
Everything Hidden Inside the Ratio
Everything Hidden Inside the Ratio. Expenses and vacancy are in there whether you look at them or not.
How to use: Screen comparables on expense ratio and vacancy, not just on rent level and sale date.
Exam Tip
The GRM's simplicity is also its weakness. Where expense ratios differ materially, direct capitalization on net income is the better tool.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Screening comparables only on recency and location
- -Ignoring expense ratio differences
- -Using a GRM where expense structures differ materially
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
A gross rent multiplier is a blunt instrument: it converts rent into value in one step, without separating out vacancy, operating expenses or capital needs. That works only if the comparables share those characteristics with the subject, because any difference between them is silently embedded in the multiplier. Two properties with identical rents but very different expense ratios have genuinely different net incomes and should sell at different prices, so a multiplier drawn from one will mislead when applied to the other. The same holds for vacancy experience and for physical character, which drives both expenses and buyer appeal. So the reliability of a GRM turns on comparability of the income characteristics, not merely on how recent or how numerous the sales are. The distractors offer proxies that miss it: a five-year window across a whole county sacrifices both market timing and location, size alone does not make properties comparable, and identical financing addresses cash equivalency rather than the income relationship.
Background Knowledge
A gross rent multiplier relates sale price to gross rent without separating vacancy, expenses or capital needs. Its reliability depends on comparables sharing the subject's expense ratios, vacancy experience and physical character.
Real-World Application
An appraiser rejects two otherwise similar sales whose expense ratios run ten points above the subject's, and derives the multiplier from three closely matched properties.
More income-approach Questions
In a percentage lease, rent is commonly structured as:
Escalation clauses and expense stops in a lease matter to the income analysis because they:
In a DCF, what is the reversion?
Potential gross income differs from effective gross income in that PGI assumes:
The reversion in a discounted cash flow model represents:
Two identical buildings differ only in risk: one has a single tenant on a short lease, the other five tenants on staggered terms. How do their cap rates compare?
Contract rent on a leased office is $30 per sq ft; market rent is $26. The $4 difference is called:
Building A (new, credit tenant, 20-year lease) and Building B (older, month-to-month tenants) sell the same week. Their cap rates should differ how?
An appraiser is analyzing a 15-unit apartment building. Market research indicates a 6% vacancy rate is typical for similar properties, but this property's historical vacancy has averaged 4%. The subject has experienced a 1% collection loss (uncollectible rents) over the past two years. When estimating effective gross income for the subject, what vacancy and collection loss percentage should the appraiser apply?
An overall rate extracted from a sale whose NOI excluded reserves, applied to a subject NOI that includes them, will:
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam
Previous Question
An overall cap rate extracted from a sale is 7.2%. The buyer financed 75% at a 6.9% constant. The equity dividend rate implied for the 25% equity share is about:
Next Question
In a discounted cash flow analysis for a commercial property, the appraiser uses a discount rate of 7.8% and a terminal capitalization rate of 6.2%. Which conclusion is supported by these rates under standard investment theory?