EstatePass
Income ApproachHARD8.2% of exam

An appraiser is verifying the sale of an apartment building. The stated price of $1,600,000 consisted of $600,000 in cash and a $1,000,000 seller note at a below-market interest rate. The market value of the note is 96.25% of its face amount. The seller paid a $50,000 brokerage commission. Stabilized annual NOI is $125,000. What overall rate does this sale indicate?

Correct Answer

B) 8.00%

The cash-equivalent price is $600,000 + ($1,000,000 × 0.9625) = $1,562,500, so the rate is $125,000 ÷ $1,562,500 = 8.00%. Using the stated price gives 7.81%. Applying the 3.75% note discount to the whole price gives 8.12%. Also subtracting the commission gives 8.26%, but a commission pays for services and is not a cash-equivalence adjustment.

Answer Options
A
7.81%
B
8.00%
C
8.12%
D
8.26%

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option B is correct because the note is worth $1,000,000 × 0.9625 = $962,500, and adding the $600,000 down payment gives a cash-equivalent price of $1,562,500. The rate is $125,000 ÷ $1,562,500 = 8.00%. The commission stays out of the calculation because it pays for services rather than for the real property.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: 7.81%

Option A, 7.81%, uses the stated price: $125,000 ÷ $1,600,000 = 7.81%. Favorable seller financing can inflate a stated price, so the denominator needs the cash-equivalent figure of $1,562,500, which gives 8.00%.

Option C: 8.12%

Option C, 8.12%, applies the discount to the entire price: $1,600,000 × 0.9625 = $1,540,000, and $125,000 ÷ $1,540,000 = 8.12%. The $600,000 down payment was cash and needs no discount, so the correct denominator is $1,562,500, which gives 8.00%.

Option D: 8.26%

Option D, 8.26%, also subtracts the commission: $1,562,500 − $50,000 = $1,512,500, and $125,000 ÷ $1,512,500 = 8.26%. A commission is a payment for services rather than a reduction in the cash equivalence of the price, so the correct rate is $125,000 ÷ $1,562,500 = 8.00%.

Discount the note, not the cash

Split the price into what the seller got in cash and what the seller got in paper. Only the paper needs a market discount.

How to use: Use this split when a comparable's price includes seller financing.

Exam Tip

Check the sale terms before you divide NOI by price. Then ask whether each adjustment affects what the seller received in cash-equivalent terms or merely what the seller paid for services.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Extracting a rate from the stated price despite non-market financing
  • -Applying a note discount to the cash down payment as well
  • -Deducting the seller's commission as a cash-equivalence adjustment

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

The skill tested is the denominator of an extracted rate. The stated price includes a below-market note, so the price must first be restated to cash equivalence, with the discount applied only to the note. The commission is a distractor, because it does not change the cash equivalence of what the seller received.

Background Knowledge

A market-derived overall rate relates income to a sale price adjusted for cash equivalency. A note with a below-market rate is worth less than its face amount, and the seller is presumed to have made up for the low rate through a higher stated price. Ordinary selling costs such as commissions are treated differently because they pay for services.

Real-World Application

An appraiser confirms a comparable sale and learns the seller carried a large note at a low rate to help the buyer close. The appraiser estimates the note's market value and restates the price before extracting a rate. The commission noted on the closing statement is not treated as a cash-equivalence adjustment.

cash equivalenceseller financingoverall raterate extractionbrokerage commission
Was this explanation helpful?

More Income Approach Questions

An undamaged but functionally inadequate system causes a supported $60,000 loss. Replacement costs $85,000 and restores only $60,000, with no other benefits. What loss classification and deduction fit?

The subject is a 10-year-old dwelling with improvement cost new of $640,000. A highly comparable 7-year-old dwelling recently sold for $580,000; at the sale date its site was worth $150,000 and its improvement cost new was $500,000. Market evidence shows depreciation accruing evenly with actual age. What is the depreciated value of the subject improvements?

Observed sale prices are $450,000, $475,000, $425,000, $500,000, $440,000. Calculate the range (maximum−minimum), to the nearest dollar.

Observed values are 100, 105, 110, 115, 120. Calculate the range (maximum−minimum).

For an arithmetic illustration only, depreciate a historical $2,000,000 construction cost on a zero-salvage straight-line 40-year schedule for 10 years. What unindexed scheduled amount remains? This is not a conclusion of current market value or current replacement cost.

For an arithmetic illustration, allocate historical construction cost $2,400,000 over 40 years on a zero-salvage equal annual schedule. After 8 years, what scheduled unindexed amount remains? This is not a current market-value conclusion.

For an arithmetic schedule only, allocate historical cost $2,500,000 over 40 years with zero residual. After 8 years, what unindexed scheduled amount remains? This is not an estimate of current market value.

The sale-price range is $45,000 and the maximum is $385,000. Find the minimum price.

A property is purchased for $1,500,000 with a loan of $1,200,000. Using the purchase price as the value, what is the loan-to-value ratio, as a percentage to one decimal?

Improvement cost new is $1,800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $200,000, $150,000, $100,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing