A client asks the appraiser to readdress a completed report to a new lender. What does USPAP require?
Correct Answer
B) Treating it as a new assignment for that client
Why this is correct: USPAP requires treating it as a new assignment for that client. The identity of the intended user is fundamental to the scope of work and cannot be changed after the fact. A new user means a new assignment, as the original explanation states. Why the other choices are wrong: You cannot simply change the addressee and reissue it. You cannot just obtain the original client's consent; the work was performed for a different user. You cannot add the new lender as an intended user later. Exam tip: The intended user is identified at the start of an assignment. If a different user needs the appraisal, it's a new assignment with a new scope of work and effective date.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Serving a new lender means the appraiser now has a new client with a new intended use, which is by definition a new assignment. That assignment gets its own problem identification, its own scope of work decision, its own report, and its own workfile. The appraiser may draw on the earlier analysis, but the deliverable has to be developed and reported for the party who will rely on it. This also protects the appraiser, because reliance by a party the report was never written for is a common source of liability claims.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Simply changing the addressee and reissuing it
Changing the addressee changes only the cover of the document while leaving intact analysis, assumptions, and reporting depth chosen for a different user. It creates the appearance that the appraiser developed the assignment for the new lender when she did not. Guidance on readdressing rejects this specifically, which is why it is the classic wrong answer.
Option C: Obtaining the original client's written consent
The original client's consent matters for confidentiality, since the Ethics Rule restricts disclosing confidential information and assignment results to anyone other than the client and stated parties. But consent solves a permission problem, not a development problem, and it cannot retroactively make the earlier work an assignment performed for the new lender. Candidates choose it because consent is genuinely required before communicating anything, so it feels like the complete answer when it is only half of one.
Option D: Adding the new lender as an intended user later
Intended users are identified at the time of the assignment, not added afterward, because their identity shapes decisions already made. Adding a name later would mean a party is relying on judgments about reporting depth and scope that were never calibrated to them. This option is the same error as changing the addressee, dressed in USPAP vocabulary.
The Report Belongs to the Question
A report is an answer to one client's question for one purpose. Change the asker or the purpose and you have a different question, which needs a fresh answer. You cannot hand someone else's answer to a new asker with the name crossed out.
How to use: When a stem says readdress, transfer, assign, or add a lender, pick the new assignment option. Save the consent answer for stems that ask about disclosing results or the existence of the assignment to a third party.
Exam Tip
Do not confuse readdressing with a transfer letter or with adding an intended user by agreement at the outset. The exam tests the after-the-fact case, and after the fact the answer is a new assignment.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Retyping the client name on a completed report and reissuing it
- -Assuming client consent alone is enough to serve a different lender
- -Forgetting that confidentiality still restricts what may be said to the new party before authorization
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
Readdressing means changing the name on the report so a different party appears to be the client or an intended user, and USPAP guidance treats that as improper. The reason is structural rather than cosmetic. Client and intended users are identified at the front of the assignment under the problem identification requirements, and those identifications drive the scope of work decision, the level of reporting detail, and even which assumptions are appropriate. A different lender with different underwriting requirements is a different intended user, and a report developed for someone else was never built to their reliance. The correct path is to accept an assignment from the new party, reidentify the problem, decide a scope of work, and issue a report to that client, even if much of the prior analysis is reused.
Background Knowledge
You need the problem identification requirements, particularly identification of the client, intended users, and intended use, and how those drive the Scope of Work Rule. You also need the Ethics Rule's confidentiality provisions governing who assignment results may be disclosed to, and the guidance that readdressing a report is not permitted.
Real-World Application
A borrower switches lenders and asks the appraiser to put the new bank's name on the existing report. The appraiser explains she cannot readdress, obtains the original client's authorization before discussing the property, accepts a new assignment from the new bank, confirms their scope requirements, and issues a report developed for them.
More USPAP Questions
Reconciliation of the approaches to value is best described as which activity?
Why should the reconciliation address the quantity of evidence as well as its quality?
How long must a report be retained compared with the workfile?
What distinguishes an appraisal review from an appraisal?
An appraiser reconciles to a value at the top of the indicated range because the client needs that figure. What has occurred?
What does it mean that a value opinion must be reasonable rather than merely arithmetically derived?
What should the reconciliation section explain to the reader?
How do the content obligations of the two report options differ with respect to the information analyzed?
The three approaches indicate $480,000, $495,000 and $610,000. What should the appraiser do first?
Three approaches indicate $1.02 million, $1.05 million and $1.04 million. How should this be reported?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam