EstatePass
ContractsPurchase_and_sale_agreement_elementsHARD

A buyer and seller in Everett have a fully executed Purchase and Sale Agreement. The seller subsequently receives a higher offer from another buyer. The seller's broker tells the original buyer that the seller has 'changed his mind' and will not proceed. The original buyer sues for specific performance. Under Washington law, which statement best describes the likely outcome?

Correct Answer

A) The buyer will likely succeed because real property is unique and a court may compel the seller to convey the property

Under Washington law, specific performance is an available remedy for breach of a real estate Purchase and Sale Agreement. Because real property is considered legally unique (no two parcels are identical), monetary damages are generally considered an inadequate remedy. Washington courts have consistently held that a buyer who has a valid, enforceable PSA may seek specific performance to compel the seller to convey the property. The seller's receipt of a better offer does not excuse performance under the existing contract.

Answer Options
A
The buyer will likely succeed because real property is unique and a court may compel the seller to convey the property
B
The buyer will likely fail because sellers in Washington have a statutory right to withdraw from any PSA within 10 days
C
The buyer will likely succeed only if the earnest money exceeded 1% of the purchase price
D
The buyer will likely fail because Washington courts do not grant specific performance for residential real estate

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

specific_performancebreach_of_contractremediesseller_defaultequitable_remedy

Related Concepts

The Statute of Frauds is a legal requirement that certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed to be enforceable. In real estate, all contracts for the sale of land or interests in land must be in writing.

A time is of the essence clause in a contract means that all deadlines and dates specified in the agreement are strictly enforceable, and failure to meet them constitutes a material breach.

An appraisal contingency allows the buyer to cancel or renegotiate the contract if the property's appraised value comes in lower than the agreed-upon purchase price. This contingency protects buyers from overpaying.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing