EstatePass
ContractsPurchase_agreementsHARD

A purchase agreement for a residential property in Spearfish, South Dakota includes a clause stating that the buyer and seller consent to dual agency by Broker Kim. The buyer and seller verbally confirmed their agreement to dual agency at the initial meeting, but neither party has signed a written dual agency consent form. Under South Dakota law, is this dual agency arrangement valid?

Correct Answer

C) No, South Dakota law requires written informed consent from all parties for dual agency, and verbal consent alone is insufficient.

Under South Dakota law (SDCL 36-21A-136 and related agency provisions), dual agency is permitted but requires written informed consent from ALL parties to the transaction. Verbal consent, even if given in the presence of all parties, does not satisfy this requirement. The failure to obtain written consent for dual agency is a disciplinary violation and a common exam trap. A dual agency clause buried in the purchase agreement may not constitute proper separate written informed consent as contemplated by South Dakota agency disclosure requirements.

Answer Options
A
Yes, verbal consent to dual agency is sufficient in South Dakota as long as both parties are present when consent is given.
B
Yes, the dual agency clause in the purchase agreement itself constitutes written consent from both parties.
C
No, South Dakota law requires written informed consent from all parties for dual agency, and verbal consent alone is insufficient.
D
No, dual agency is prohibited in South Dakota regardless of the form of consent obtained.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

dual_agencywritten_consentagency_disclosureinformed_consentsouth_dakota_specific

Related Concepts

A bilateral contract is an agreement in which both parties exchange promises and are both obligated to perform, while a unilateral contract is one in which only one party makes a promise and the other party is not obligated to act.

A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to perform their obligations under the contract without a legal excuse. The non-breaching party is entitled to legal remedies including damages, specific performance, or contract rescission.

Consideration is something of value exchanged between parties to a contract, making the agreement legally binding. It can be money, a promise to act, a promise to refrain from acting, or anything else of value.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing