EstatePass
Pa Fair Housing Human Relations ActPa_human_relations_actMEDIUM

A landlord in Erie, Pennsylvania, uses a third-party tenant screening service that assigns risk scores partly based on applicants' zip codes. An analysis reveals that applicants from predominantly Black neighborhoods receive lower scores. Under the PA Human Relations Act, the landlord:

Correct Answer

C) May be liable for disparate impact discrimination even though the landlord did not personally design the screening criteria

Under the PA Human Relations Act and federal fair housing law, landlords are responsible for the screening tools they use. If a third-party screening service produces racially disparate results, the landlord may be liable under the disparate impact theory, even without discriminatory intent.

Answer Options
A
Is not liable because the screening service, not the landlord, made the decision
B
Is not liable because the landlord did not intend to discriminate
C
May be liable for disparate impact discrimination even though the landlord did not personally design the screening criteria
D
Is liable only if the screening service explicitly uses race as a factor

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

tenant_screeningthird_partydisparate_impactzip_code

Related Concepts

License requirements are the mandatory qualifications—including pre-licensing education, examination, and background checks—that a person must satisfy before legally practicing real estate. These requirements are established and enforced by each state's real estate commission.

Market allocation is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to divide markets among themselves by geographic area, property type, or price range, thereby eliminating competition.

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing