EstatePass
Pa Fair Housing Human Relations ActPa_human_relations_actEASY

A landlord in Pennsylvania receives a complaint filed with the PHRC alleging religious discrimination. During the PHRC's investigation, the landlord retaliates by increasing the complainant's rent. Under the PA Human Relations Act, this retaliation is:

Correct Answer

C) A separate violation of the PA Human Relations Act, which prohibits retaliation against persons who file complaints

Under the PA Human Relations Act (43 P.S. §955(d)), it is unlawful to retaliate against any person who files a complaint, testifies, or participates in a proceeding under the Act. Increasing rent in response to a complaint constitutes prohibited retaliation.

Answer Options
A
Lawful because landlords may adjust rent at any time
B
Lawful because the rent increase is a separate business decision unrelated to the complaint
C
A separate violation of the PA Human Relations Act, which prohibits retaliation against persons who file complaints
D
Unlawful only if the rent increase exceeds 10%

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

retaliationrent_increasephrc_complaintprohibited_conduct

Related Concepts

License requirements are the mandatory qualifications—including pre-licensing education, examination, and background checks—that a person must satisfy before legally practicing real estate. These requirements are established and enforced by each state's real estate commission.

Market allocation is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to divide markets among themselves by geographic area, property type, or price range, thereby eliminating competition.

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing