EstatePass
Pa Fair Housing Human Relations ActFederal_fha_paMEDIUM

An apartment complex in Pennsylvania requires all applicants to provide a Social Security number as part of the application process. An applicant who is a lawful permanent resident with valid documentation but no Social Security number is denied. Under fair housing law, this requirement MOST likely:

Correct Answer

C) May constitute national origin discrimination if it disproportionately excludes applicants of certain nationalities

While requiring identification is generally permissible, a blanket requirement for a Social Security number may have a disparate impact on applicants of certain national origins, particularly immigrants who are lawfully present but may not yet have a Social Security number. This could constitute national origin discrimination under the PA Human Relations Act (43 P.S. §955).

Answer Options
A
Is unlawful because landlords cannot require any identification documents
B
Is lawful because requiring identification is a standard business practice
C
May constitute national origin discrimination if it disproportionately excludes applicants of certain nationalities
D
Is lawful because immigration status is not a protected class under the PA Human Relations Act

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

national_origindisparate_impactidentification_requirementsssn

Related Concepts

Market allocation is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to divide markets among themselves by geographic area, property type, or price range, thereby eliminating competition.

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Pa Fair Housing Human Relations Act Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing