Under New York's Property Condition Disclosure Act, a seller can choose the $500 credit option in all of the following situations EXCEPT:
Correct Answer
A) When selling a 6-unit apartment building they own as an investment
NY Real Property Law §462 applies only to residential real property of four or fewer dwelling units. A 6-unit apartment building exceeds this limit and is not covered by the Property Condition Disclosure Act, so the $500 credit option is not available.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Deep Analysis of This Agency Relationships Disclosures Ny Specific Question
Background Knowledge for Agency Relationships Disclosures Ny Specific
Real World Application in Agency Relationships Disclosures Ny Specific
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Agency Relationships Disclosures Ny Specific Questions
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
Related Concepts
An agency relationship created when a principal approves or accepts an agent's previously unauthorized actions, effectively granting authority after the fact.
The legal requirement for real estate agents to inform all parties about who they represent in a transaction, typically provided at first substantive contact.
A legal relationship in which one person (the agent) is authorized to act on behalf of another person (the principal) in business transactions with third parties.
More Agency Relationships Disclosures Ny Specific Questions
Tom's listing agent informs him that instead of completing the Property Condition Disclosure Statement, he can provide a credit to the buyer. When must this $500 credit be provided under New York law?
At closing, a buyer receives a $500 credit from the seller under NY RPL §462 in lieu of a Property Condition Disclosure Statement. What does this credit represent, and what obligations does it create for the seller?
What is the primary purpose of New York's $500 credit option under the Property Condition Disclosure Act?
When a seller elects not to provide the Property Condition Disclosure Statement under New York law, which party bears the obligation to satisfy the resulting $500 statutory requirement, and how is it typically fulfilled?
Under New York's Property Condition Disclosure Act, what is the amount of credit a seller can provide to a buyer in lieu of completing the disclosure statement?
- → Which document would show the $500 Property Condition Disclosure credit that a seller provides to a buyer?
- → Under New York RPL §462, a seller has completed a Property Condition Disclosure Statement but has not yet delivered it to any prospective buyer. The seller asks their listing agent about the $500 credit option as an alternative to providing the disclosure. Which of the following is the most accurate statement about the seller's options at this stage?
- → A buyer in Troy receives a $500 credit from the seller instead of a Property Condition Disclosure Statement. After closing, the buyer discovers the seller was aware of a roof leak but didn't mention it. What legal principle still protects the buyer?
- → A seller in Rochester initially chose to provide the $500 credit but now, two days before closing, wants to complete the Property Condition Disclosure Statement instead and keep the $500. The buyer prefers to receive the credit. What should happen?
- → A seller chose to provide a buyer with the $500 credit under NY RPL §462 in lieu of a Property Condition Disclosure Statement. At closing, the buyer seeks the credit but the seller denies having agreed to it, and no written documentation of the election appears in the contract. Which of the following best describes the legal and practical challenge the buyer faces?
- → An executor administering a deceased owner's estate is preparing to sell the decedent's property in Queens. The executor has never occupied or managed the property and has no firsthand knowledge of its condition. Under NY Real Property Law §462, which statement most accurately describes the executor's disclosure obligations?
- → A seller provides a Property Condition Disclosure Statement to the buyer, then discovers a significant plumbing defect before closing. Under New York Real Property Law §462, what is the seller's obligation regarding this newly discovered condition?
- → Maria is purchasing a home in Rochester. The seller chose not to provide a Property Condition Disclosure Statement and instead gave her a $500 credit at closing. Three months after closing, Maria discovers significant foundation problems that would have been apparent to the seller. What is Maria's legal position?
- → A listing agent's seller client asks if they can provide a $300 credit instead of the full $500 to save money while still avoiding the disclosure statement. How should the agent respond?
- → A seller in Yonkers provides both a completed Property Condition Disclosure Statement and a $500 credit to the buyer. Is this arrangement permissible under New York law?
People Also Study
Buyer Representation Agreement
8% of exam
Property Ownership
10% of exam
Land Use Controls and Regulations
8% of exam
Valuation and Market Analysis
10% of exam
Related Articles
Real Estate Exam Practice Questions by Topic (2026): Free Sets for Contracts, Agency, Financing
Get topic-based real estate exam practice sets and a simple sequence to move from learning to timed mocks.
Real Estate Exam Topics (2026): High-Yield Areas + Common Traps (Contracts, Agency, Financing, Fair Housing)
Learn the highest-frequency real estate exam topics and the traps that cause most wrong answers—plus how to study them.
Real Estate Exam Agency & Fiduciary Duties (2026): Scenarios + Practice Questions
Master agency relationships and fiduciary duties using scenario patterns and practice questions built for exam wording.
Previous Question
A seller in Yonkers provides both a completed Property Condition Disclosure Statement and a $500 credit to the buyer. Is this arrangement permissible under New York law?
Next Question
A buyer in Troy receives a $500 credit from the seller instead of a Property Condition Disclosure Statement. After closing, the buyer discovers the seller was aware of a roof leak but didn't mention it. What legal principle still protects the buyer?