Sandra is selling her home in Las Vegas and is aware that the roof has a slow leak that she patched herself two years ago. She believes the patch has held and does not mention the roof issue on the Seller's Real Property Disclosure Form. After closing, the buyer discovers significant water damage in the attic. Under NRS Chapter 113, what is the most likely consequence for Sandra?
Correct Answer
A) Sandra may face civil liability for failing to disclose a known material defect on the Seller's Real Property Disclosure Form.
Under NRS Chapter 113, sellers are required to disclose all known material defects and conditions affecting the property on the Seller's Real Property Disclosure Form. A roof leak that Sandra was personally aware of constitutes a known material defect. Failure to disclose it exposes Sandra to civil liability, including potential rescission of the sale or damages. The fact that she made a repair does not eliminate the obligation to disclose the prior defect and the repair, as a buyer has the right to know about past and present conditions.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Deep Analysis of This Mandated Disclosures Question
Background Knowledge for Mandated Disclosures
Real World Application in Mandated Disclosures
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Mandated Disclosures Questions
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
Related Concepts
A material defect is a condition that significantly affects the value, desirability, or safety of a property and that would likely influence a reasonable buyer's decision to purchase or the price they would pay.
Megan's Law requires states to make information about registered sex offenders available to the public. Some states require real estate agents to inform buyers about the availability of sex offender registries.
Mold disclosure involves informing buyers about the presence of mold or conditions that are conducive to mold growth in a property. While no federal mold disclosure law exists, many states require disclosure of known mold issues.
More Mandated Disclosures Questions
In Vermont, a client refuses to allow a disclosure the licensee believes is necessary. Which statement is correct?
In Vermont, unpermitted construction or septic work affects a Vermont property. Which statement is correct?
A Vermont licensee is asked about a seller's agent knows a serious property defect or limitation. What is the best answer?
In Vermont, a licensee markets a pre-1978 Vermont residential rental property. Which statement is correct?
In Vermont, a seller's agent knows a serious property defect or limitation. Which statement is correct?
- → In Vermont, covered pre-1978 property is shown to a buyer. Which statement is correct?
- → In Vermont, the property is subject to a right of first refusal. Which statement is correct?
- → A Vermont licensee is asked about unpermitted construction or septic work affects a Vermont property. What is the best answer?
- → An Oklahoma licensee is asked about a seller learns of a new defect after already delivering a disclosure or disclaimer statement. What is the best answer?
- → Which Oklahoma rule applies when a seller wants to use the Oklahoma disclaimer statement instead of a disclosure statement?
- → An Oklahoma licensee is asked about a seller of covered Oklahoma residential property is preparing for a buyer’s offer. What is the best answer?
- → In Oklahoma real estate practice, a seller has not yet accepted a purchaser’s offer. What should the licensee remember?
- → For the Oklahoma salesperson state portion, a disclosure statement is delivered after an offer to purchase has been made. Which statement is correct?
- → Which Oklahoma rule applies when a real estate licensee actually knows of a property defect that is not included in the seller’s disclosure statement?
- → In Oklahoma real estate practice, a newly constructed dwelling has never been occupied. What should the licensee remember?