EstatePass
AgencyDual_agencyHARD

New Jersey broker Lee's firm lists seller Park's property. Buyer Quinn contacts the firm and signs a buyer representation agreement with salesperson Nora, who works for Lee's firm. Lee's firm has a designated agency policy: Nora is designated for Quinn and salesperson Max is designated for Park. During attorney review, Quinn's attorney discovers that Park's seller disclosure statement omitted a known roof defect. Quinn wants to withdraw from the contract. Park insists the roof was repaired before listing. Broker Lee, who is in a dual agency position, is asked by both parties to provide her opinion on whether the roof defect was adequately repaired. What is the most appropriate action for Broker Lee?

Correct Answer

B) Decline to provide a professional opinion on the roof repair and advise both parties to rely on their attorneys and independent inspectors

This is a sophisticated dual agency scenario involving a legal dispute during attorney review. Broker Lee, as the supervising broker in a dual agency position, cannot provide a professional opinion on the adequacy of the roof repair without potentially favoring one party over the other. Providing such an opinion could constitute advocacy for one side, expose Lee to liability, and undermine the neutrality required of a dual agent. The most appropriate action is to decline to opine on the disputed factual/legal matter and direct both parties to rely on their attorneys (who are already involved during attorney review) and independent professional inspectors. This protects both parties and preserves the integrity of the dual agency.

Answer Options
A
Provide her professional opinion on the roof repair to both parties equally, since she is a neutral dual agent
B
Decline to provide a professional opinion on the roof repair and advise both parties to rely on their attorneys and independent inspectors
C
Provide her opinion only to Park, since Max is Park's designated agent and Lee supervises Max
D
Provide her opinion only to Quinn, since Quinn is the aggrieved party and Lee owes Quinn a heightened duty of care

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Agency Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Agency Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

dual_agencybroker_neutralitydisclosure_disputeattorney_reviewdesignated_agency

Related Concepts

The extent of power and actions an agent is authorized to perform on behalf of the principal, as defined by the agency agreement.

The fiduciary obligations owed by a listing agent to the seller, including marketing the property, presenting all offers, and protecting the seller's confidential information.

A practice where the agent or brokerage represents only one party in a transaction — either the buyer or the seller, but never both.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Agency Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Agency Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing