EstatePass
AgencyDual_agencyHARD

Salesperson Rita at Cambridge Realty in Massachusetts is acting as a dual agent with written consent from both buyer Steve and seller Gwen. After the purchase and sale agreement is signed, Steve discovers through his own independent research that the property has a history of flooding that Gwen did not disclose and that Rita was unaware of. Steve sues Rita and Cambridge Realty under MGL Chapter 93A, claiming that the dual agency relationship and Rita's failure to investigate constituted an unfair or deceptive practice. Which of the following most accurately describes Rita's potential liability under Massachusetts law?

Correct Answer

D) Rita may have liability under Chapter 93A if she failed to exercise reasonable care to discover material defects, regardless of her lack of actual knowledge

Under MGL Chapter 93A, real estate licensees can be held liable not only for active misrepresentation but also for failing to exercise reasonable care in discovering and disclosing material defects. Even if Rita was genuinely unaware of the flooding history, a court may find that a reasonably competent licensee acting in a dual agency capacity should have inquired about the property's condition more thoroughly. Chapter 93A imposes a standard of reasonable care, and failure to meet that standard — even without actual knowledge — can constitute an unfair or deceptive practice. Additionally, Chapter 93A allows for double or treble damages and attorney's fees, which significantly expands potential liability beyond a simple refund of commission.

Answer Options
A
Rita has no liability because she was unaware of the flooding history and had obtained dual agency consent from both parties
B
Rita's liability is limited to returning her commission, because Chapter 93A caps damages at the amount of the transaction fee paid to the licensee
C
Rita is automatically liable under Chapter 93A because dual agency relationships are inherently deceptive under Massachusetts law
D
Rita may have liability under Chapter 93A if she failed to exercise reasonable care to discover material defects, regardless of her lack of actual knowledge

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Agency Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Agency Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

chapter_93Adual_agencylicensee_liabilityreasonable_careexpert_trap

Related Concepts

In real estate, a client is someone to whom the agent owes fiduciary duties through an agency relationship, while a customer is a third party to whom the agent owes only honesty and fair dealing.

An arrangement where a brokerage assigns separate agents within the firm to represent the buyer and seller in the same transaction, allowing each client to have dedicated representation.

A situation where a single agent or brokerage represents both the buyer and the seller in the same real estate transaction.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Agency Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Agency Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing