What makes assignment results credible under USPAP?
Correct Answer
D) Support by relevant evidence and logic, as the intended use requires
Credible means worthy of belief. Assignment results require relevant evidence and logic to the degree necessary for their intended use. Client approval, a polished form or a confidentiality label alone does not provide that support. Appropriate scope and competent methods must address the identified appraisal or review problem.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because USPAP defines credible as worthy of belief and states that credible assignment results require support by relevant evidence and logic to the degree necessary for the intended use.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: The client’s agreement with the result reached
Option A is wrong because the client's agreement with the result does not make it credible. Credibility comes from evidence and logic, not approval.
Option B: A preference that favors one of the parties to the transaction
Option B is wrong because a preference that favors one party to the transaction is bias. Bias undermines credibility rather than creating it.
Option C: A label marking the report as confidential to the client
Option C is wrong because a label marking the report confidential has no bearing on whether the results are supported. Confidentiality controls disclosure, not credibility.
Evidence plus logic equals credible
Credible results stand on two legs, relevant evidence and sound logic, sized to the intended use.
How to use: Use this whenever a question asks what makes results credible.
Exam Tip
Look for the phrase relevant evidence and logic; choices based on approval, labels or preferences do not fit the definition.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Equating client satisfaction with credibility
- -Forgetting that credibility is tied to intended use
- -Thinking formatting or labels add credibility
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the USPAP definition of credible. Credible results require support by relevant evidence and logic to the degree necessary for the intended use.
Background Knowledge
Credibility is measured in the context of the intended use, so the level of support needed can vary by assignment. Appropriate scope of work and competent methods are the means of achieving it.
Real-World Application
A reviewer finds that an appraisal's value is supported by verified comparable sales and clearly explained adjustments. The reviewer concludes the results are credible for the lending use.
More USPAP Questions
Under USPAP, what are assignment results?
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
Under 2024 USPAP, which statement correctly combines the requirements for an oral real property appraisal report and its workfile?
An appraiser accepts an assignment involving a property type the appraiser has valued once before, years ago. Competency requires:
A Certified General appraiser is asked to value a specialized industrial property for the first time. The appraiser knows a competency gap exists before agreeing to the assignment. What is required if the appraiser proceeds?
Under 2024 USPAP Standard 1, which listed assignment element must be identified in developing a real property appraisal?
An appraiser provided an appraisal of the same property for another client 18 months ago. No confidentiality obligation prevents disclosing the fact of that service. Before agreeing to a new assignment, the appraiser must:
According to USPAP, what is the primary purpose of the Ethics Rule?
An appraiser is asked to determine 'fair market value' for an assignment. According to USPAP, the appraiser should:
Which list gives the sections of the 2024 USPAP Ethics Rule?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
An appraiser who is not competent and cannot become competent for an assignment must:
Next Question
A client asks the appraiser to remove a verified relevant comparable solely because its supported indication is below the desired value. No new factual defect is identified. What should the appraiser do?