EstatePass
Income ApproachHARD8.2% of exam

An appraiser reviewing a trainee's work finds that the trainee extracted an 8% overall rate from sales of older fourplexes similar to the subject. The trainee then added 2.5 percentage points as a recapture allowance for the building's remaining economic life before capitalizing NOI. What is the main problem with this step?

Correct Answer

D) Recapture is implicit in a rate extracted from sales, so the added allowance counts capital recovery twice.

An overall rate extracted from sales implicitly provides for both the return on and the return of capital, because both are reflected in the prices buyers paid. Adding a recapture allowance therefore counts capital recovery twice and understates value. Treating recapture as an operating cost simply moves the same double count into NOI. Land is generally not a wasting asset, and recapture does not follow the term of the buyer's loan.

Answer Options
A
Recapture is an operating cost, so the allowance should be deducted from NOI and not added to the rate.
B
Recapture relates to the land as well, so the allowance should be based on the total property value.
C
Recapture follows the buyer's loan payoff, so the allowance should be based on the loan's amortization term.
D
Recapture is implicit in a rate extracted from sales, so the added allowance counts capital recovery twice.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option D is correct because direct capitalization makes no separate allocation between return on and return of the investment. Those assumptions are implicit in a rate derived from comparable sales. Adding 2.5 percentage points to the extracted 8% counts capital recovery a second time, which raises the rate and understates value.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Recapture is an operating cost, so the allowance should be deducted from NOI and not added to the rate.

Option A treats recapture as an operating cost to deduct from NOI. Recapture is a recovery of capital rather than an expense of operating the property, and deducting it from NOI would still duplicate what the extracted rate already reflects.

Option B: Recapture relates to the land as well, so the allowance should be based on the total property value.

Option B says the allowance should relate to the land as well and be based on total property value. Land is generally treated as a non-wasting asset that needs no capital recovery, and the real problem is that the extracted rate already reflects recovery.

Option C: Recapture follows the buyer's loan payoff, so the allowance should be based on the loan's amortization term.

Option C ties recapture to the buyer's loan payoff and amortization term. Loan amortization describes how the debt is repaid, which differs from recovery of the investment in the property, and the extracted rate already reflects that recovery.

The price already priced it

Buyers considered the building's age when they set the price. A rate taken from that price has the age effect built in.

How to use: Use this reminder when a problem suggests adding anything to a rate that was extracted from sales.

Exam Tip

Check where a rate came from before adjusting it. A market-extracted overall rate differs from a rate built up from components, which may need a separate recapture element.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Adding recapture to a market-extracted overall rate
  • -Treating recapture as an operating expense
  • -Confusing recovery of the investment with amortization of the loan

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

The skill tested is what an overall rate contains, not how to divide by it. Buyers' prices already reflect their expectations about the recovery of the investment and the return on it, so a rate extracted from those prices carries both. The reasoning step is to see that adding recapture to such a rate duplicates something already there.

Background Knowledge

Investors expect both a return of their capital and a return on it. In yield capitalization these can be handled explicitly through compound interest and annuity factors, but direct capitalization relates one year's income to value in one step. The overall rate from comparable sales therefore carries the recovery assumption implicitly.

Real-World Application

A junior analyst worries that an 8% rate from sales of older buildings ignores their limited remaining life and adds a recapture allowance. The reviewing appraiser points out that buyers of those older buildings had already factored age into their prices. The addition is removed before the value conclusion is reported.

overall raterecapturereturn of capitalreturn on capitalmarket extraction
Was this explanation helpful?

More Income Approach Questions

Which model describes yield capitalization of property benefits?

An appraiser is valuing a duplex. A market survey of recent duplex sales reports prices at 10.8 times potential gross income, with stabilized vacancy and credit loss of 10% of PGI and no other income. The subject's rent schedule is unavailable, but the property manager's records show collected income of $54,000 a year, in line with market rent and the 10% market loss. What value is indicated?

The subject property is a fourplex with annual EGI of $72,000 and operating expenses of $28,800. Of those expenses, $18,000 is fixed and $10,800 varies in direct proportion to EGI. The owner's annual mortgage payments are $21,000. An appraiser projects that EGI will fall 10% because of higher vacancy. What is the projected NOI?

Annual NOI available for debt service is $168,000 and total annual mortgage principal and interest debt service is $120,000. What is NOI ÷ debt service?

Annual PGI is $250,000 and combined vacancy and collection loss is explicitly 12% of that same PGI base. There is no other income. What annual EGI remains?

Annual PGI is $360,000 and combined vacancy and collection loss is explicitly 8% of that same PGI base. There is no other income. What annual EGI remains?

Annual PGI is $640,000. Combined vacancy and collection loss is 6.25% of PGI. There is no other income. What EGI remains?

An appraiser is updating a prior appraisal of a triplex with potential gross income of $60,000 and no other income. The prior appraisal used vacancy and credit loss of 5% of PGI, and a new survey of competing rentals indicates 8%. The operating expenses of $24,000 are property taxes, insurance and contract services that do not vary with occupancy, and the market overall rate remains 7.5%. By what percentages do effective gross income and indicated value decrease?

Annual potential rental income is $600,000 and vacancy loss alone is $36,000. What percentage of potential rent does that loss represent?

In the subject's market, lenders on fourplexes have lowered their typical loan-to-value ratio from 70% to 60%. The annual mortgage constant remains 5% and the equity dividend rate remains 10%. The subject's NOI has not changed. How does this affect the overall rate indicated by the band of investment and the indicated value?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing