EstatePass
Income ApproachMEDIUM8.2% of exam

The subject property is a multi-tenant retail center with mid-term leases to regional tenants and NOI of $96,000. An appraiser extracts overall rates from three recent sales. Sale 1, at 7.5%, has long leases to national tenants. Sale 2, at 8%, has mid-term leases to regional tenants. Sale 3, at 9.3%, has short leases and frequent tenant turnover. What is the most reasonable value indication?

Correct Answer

C) $1,200,000

Less certain income is capitalized at a higher rate, so the rate should come from the sale whose income risk matches the subject. Sale 2 matches, and $96,000 ÷ 0.08 = $1,200,000. Sale 1's rate gives $1,280,000, which credits the subject with stronger leases than it has. Sale 3's rate gives $1,032,258, which charges it for weaker ones. The simple mean of 8.27% gives $1,161,290 and lets the dissimilar sales set the answer.

Answer Options
A
$1,032,258
B
$1,161,290
C
$1,200,000
D
$1,280,000

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option C is correct because Sale 2's mid-term leases to regional tenants match the subject, so its 8% rate best reflects the certainty of the subject's income. Dividing $96,000 by 8% indicates $1,200,000.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: $1,032,258

Option A, $1,032,258, is $96,000 ÷ 0.093 using Sale 3. That sale has short leases and frequent tenant turnover, so its rate overstates the subject's risk. The correct calculation is $96,000 ÷ 0.08 = $1,200,000.

Option B: $1,161,290

Option B, $1,161,290, uses the unrounded mean rate: (7.5% + 8% + 9.3%) ÷ 3 = 8.2667%, and $96,000 ÷ 0.082667 rounds to that figure. Averaging gives equal say to two sales with different risk from the subject and is pulled up by Sale 3. The correct calculation is $96,000 ÷ 0.08 = $1,200,000.

Option D: $1,280,000

Option D, $1,280,000, is $96,000 ÷ 0.075 using Sale 1. Its long leases to national tenants carry less risk than the subject's leases, so its rate understates the subject's risk. The correct calculation is $96,000 ÷ 0.08 = $1,200,000.

Riskier income, higher rate

More doubt about collecting the income means a higher rate and a lower value. Pick the sale whose doubt level matches the subject.

How to use: Use this when several extracted rates come with facts about leases or tenants.

Exam Tip

Avoid averaging rates when the sales are described as different from one another. Those descriptions are there to guide a selection.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Averaging rates from sales with clearly different risk
  • -Using the lowest rate because it gives the highest value
  • -Ignoring lease term and tenant quality when selecting a rate

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

A judgment step comes ahead of the division. Three rates are available, and the facts about leases and tenants show which sale has income risk like the subject's. The reasoning is to compare risk first, select the rate, and then capitalize.

Background Knowledge

The capitalization rate reflects, among other things, how certain the income is. Sales with different lease terms and tenant quality can properly show different rates. An appraiser reconciles a range by comparing each sale's characteristics to the subject, not by mechanical averaging.

Real-World Application

An appraiser values a retail center and finds sales ranging from a national-tenant property to a struggling strip center. The appraiser gives most weight to the sale with a similar lease profile and explains why the others bracket the subject.

rate selectionincome riskoverall ratelease qualitymarket extraction
Was this explanation helpful?

More Income Approach Questions

Which model describes yield capitalization of property benefits?

An appraiser is valuing a duplex. A market survey of recent duplex sales reports prices at 10.8 times potential gross income, with stabilized vacancy and credit loss of 10% of PGI and no other income. The subject's rent schedule is unavailable, but the property manager's records show collected income of $54,000 a year, in line with market rent and the 10% market loss. What value is indicated?

The subject property is a fourplex with annual EGI of $72,000 and operating expenses of $28,800. Of those expenses, $18,000 is fixed and $10,800 varies in direct proportion to EGI. The owner's annual mortgage payments are $21,000. An appraiser projects that EGI will fall 10% because of higher vacancy. What is the projected NOI?

Annual NOI available for debt service is $168,000 and total annual mortgage principal and interest debt service is $120,000. What is NOI ÷ debt service?

Annual PGI is $250,000 and combined vacancy and collection loss is explicitly 12% of that same PGI base. There is no other income. What annual EGI remains?

Annual PGI is $360,000 and combined vacancy and collection loss is explicitly 8% of that same PGI base. There is no other income. What annual EGI remains?

Annual PGI is $640,000. Combined vacancy and collection loss is 6.25% of PGI. There is no other income. What EGI remains?

An appraiser is updating a prior appraisal of a triplex with potential gross income of $60,000 and no other income. The prior appraisal used vacancy and credit loss of 5% of PGI, and a new survey of competing rentals indicates 8%. The operating expenses of $24,000 are property taxes, insurance and contract services that do not vary with occupancy, and the market overall rate remains 7.5%. By what percentages do effective gross income and indicated value decrease?

Annual potential rental income is $600,000 and vacancy loss alone is $36,000. What percentage of potential rent does that loss represent?

In the subject's market, lenders on fourplexes have lowered their typical loan-to-value ratio from 70% to 60%. The annual mortgage constant remains 5% and the equity dividend rate remains 10%. The subject's NOI has not changed. How does this affect the overall rate indicated by the band of investment and the indicated value?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing