Why identify and reconcile appraised property rights before treating physical attributes as equivalent?
Correct Answer
A) To ensure the evidence concerns comparable rights before relying on physical-price comparisons.
Begin by aligning the appraised rights and defining compatible transaction/price bases before comparing property differences. The exact numerical sequence follows the supported bases and dependencies; there is no universal rule that every transaction difference is more objectively measurable.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because the price of a sale reflects the specific rights conveyed, so the appraiser must ensure the evidence concerns comparable rights before relying on physical comparisons. If the rights differ, the comparable price must be adjusted to reflect that difference. Only then do physical differences translate meaningfully into price differences.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: Physical differences define the ownership rights in each sale.
Option B is wrong because physical differences do not define the ownership rights in a sale. Rights such as fee simple or leased fee are legal interests, separate from the physical features of the property.
Option C: Location adjustments eliminate any need to identify rights.
Option C is wrong because location adjustments do not eliminate the need to identify rights. A location adjustment addresses where a property is, not what legal interest was transferred.
Option D: Time adjustments cure different legal interests between the sales, without further analysis of the rights.
Option D is wrong because time adjustments do not cure different legal interests between sales. A market-conditions adjustment accounts for changes over time, not for differences in the rights conveyed.
Rights first, bricks second
Make sure the sales transferred comparable legal rights before comparing the physical buildings.
How to use: Use this to recall why rights conveyed comes early in the adjustment process.
Exam Tip
When an option claims a location or time adjustment fixes a rights difference, it is mixing up separate elements of comparison.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Comparing physical features before confirming the rights conveyed
- -Assuming a time or location adjustment accounts for a leased fee sale
- -Treating physically similar sales as equivalent regardless of rights
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests why property rights are addressed before physical comparisons. If the subject and a comparable involve different rights, their prices are not directly comparable, no matter how similar the buildings are. Aligning rights first makes later physical-price comparisons meaningful.
Background Knowledge
The property rights conveyed, such as fee simple or leased fee, directly affect sale price. Appraisers typically address transactional elements like rights, financing and conditions of sale before property characteristics. The exact sequence of adjustments follows the supported bases, but price evidence should concern comparable rights before physical comparisons are relied on.
Real-World Application
An appraiser valuing a fee simple single-family house finds a nearly identical house that sold subject to a long-term lease. Before comparing size and condition, the appraiser analyzes how the lease affected the price. Only after accounting for the rights difference are the physical adjustments considered.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?
Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?
Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:
Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?
Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?
When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:
A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?
In reconciliation, an appraiser should:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam