After material transaction differences are normalized, supported qualitative comparisons place the subject between two competitive property indications of $322,000 and $314,000. What does this ranking indicate without further precision evidence?
Correct Answer
A) Between $314,000 and $322,000
Under the stated supported ranking and normalized comparison conditions, the subject is indicated between $314,000 and $322,000. Ranking alone does not fix the exact midpoint $318,000 or require either endpoint. It does not automatically establish an interval from arbitrary unadjusted prices without relevant comparable support.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because a supported qualitative ranking that places the subject between indications of $314,000 and $322,000 indicates a value within that bracket. Qualitative analysis ranks comparables as superior or inferior without stating dollar or percentage adjustments, so it locates the subject in the array rather than at a precise number. Without further precision evidence, the range from $314,000 to $322,000 is what the ranking supports.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: Exactly $318,000, the midpoint
Option B is wrong because exactly $318,000, the midpoint, is ($314,000 + $322,000) / 2, a mechanical average that the ranking does not establish. Ranking shows the subject falls between the two indications, not that it sits halfway between them.
Option C: Below $314,000, the lower price
Option C is wrong because a value below $314,000, the lower price, contradicts the ranking itself. If the subject ranks between the two competitive properties, its indication cannot fall under the lower one.
Option D: At $322,000, the higher price
Option D is wrong because placing the subject at $322,000, the higher price, treats it as equal to the upper property. The ranking places the subject between the two indications and does not require either endpoint.
Ranking brackets, not pinpoints
Think of qualitative ranking as placing a book on a shelf between two others: you know its neighbors, not its exact width. The result is a range bounded by the neighbors.
How to use: Use this image whenever a question asks what a superior/inferior ranking alone can establish.
Exam Tip
When a question says ranking alone with no further precision evidence, prefer the bracketed range over a precise midpoint or endpoint.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Assuming the midpoint of the bracket is the indicated value
- -Treating qualitative ranking as if it produced dollar adjustments
- -Placing the subject outside the bracket its own ranking defines
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests what qualitative ranking can and cannot tell you. When supported superior/inferior comparisons place the subject between two competitive indications, the ranking brackets the value but does not measure an exact point within the bracket. The reasoning answer is therefore a range, not a single figure.
Background Knowledge
Qualitative analysis compares comparables to the subject by ranking them as superior, inferior or similar instead of quantifying adjustments. The subject is then placed within the ranked array of sales to estimate its value. This technique brackets value and is often used alongside quantitative adjustments when paired data are scarce.
Real-World Application
An appraiser has two well-verified sales of competing homes, one clearly superior and one clearly inferior to the subject, but too little paired data to quantify the differences. After normalizing transaction terms, she reports that the subject falls between the two indications and uses other evidence and reasoning to select a point within that range.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?
Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?
Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:
Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?
Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?
When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:
A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?
In reconciliation, an appraiser should:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
A supported price-to-income multiplier of 120 is explicitly defined on the same period and income basis as the subject’s $3,500 income. With no further adjustments, what value is indicated by multiplying the two?
Next Question
The subject contains 1,900 square feet. The three comparables contain 1,700, 1,780 and 1,840 square feet, and gross living area is supported at $70 per square foot. What is the concern?