EstatePass
MarketMEDIUM13.6% of exam

An office market segment has 50,000 square feet available. Absorption has been stable at 120,000 square feet per year, and no new or returning supply is expected. At that pace, how long will it take to absorb the available space?

Correct Answer

C) 5.0 months

Monthly pace =120,000 SF/12=10,000 SF/month; duration=50,000 SF/(10,000 SF/month)=5 months. Use the same population, period and price/listing definition throughout. Common errors: dividing by the annual pace and reporting years as months gives 0.4 months; inverting the ratio (pace ÷ availability) gives 2.4 months; multiplying the monthly result by 12 gives 60.0 months.

Answer Options
A
0.4 months
B
2.4 months
C
5.0 months
D
60.0 months

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option C is correct because the monthly pace is 120,000 SF / 12 = 10,000 SF per month, and 50,000 SF / 10,000 SF per month = 5.0 months. With no new or returning supply assumed, current availability would be absorbed in about five months at that pace.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: 0.4 months

Option A is wrong because 0.4 months comes from dividing by the annual pace, 50,000 / 120,000 = about 0.42, which is a figure in years, and labeling it months. Converting the pace to 10,000 SF per month gives 50,000 / 10,000 = 5.0 months.

Option B: 2.4 months

Option B is wrong because 2.4 months comes from inverting the ratio: 120,000 / 50,000 = 2.4, which divides pace by availability. Duration is availability divided by monthly pace: 50,000 / 10,000 = 5.0 months.

Option D: 60.0 months

Option D is wrong because 60.0 months comes from multiplying the correct monthly result by 12: 5.0 x 12 = 60. The 5.0 figure is already in months, so no further conversion is needed.

Space over pace

Duration equals available space over absorption pace, with the pace stated per month to get months.

How to use: Use space over pace on any absorption-duration question and check that the units match.

Exam Tip

Convert annual absorption to monthly before dividing, then sanity-check: absorbing 10,000 SF a month, 50,000 SF should take about five months.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Dividing by the annual pace and reporting years as months
  • -Inverting the ratio of pace to availability
  • -Multiplying an answer already in months by 12

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests an inventory-duration calculation for office space: available space divided by the monthly absorption pace. The annual pace must first be converted to a monthly pace so the answer comes out in months.

Background Knowledge

Absorption rate is the rate at which available space is leased or sold in a specific market during a given period. Dividing available inventory by the absorption rate per period gives the time needed to absorb it, assuming the pace holds and no new supply arrives. The same population, period and space definition should be used throughout.

Real-World Application

An appraiser analyzing a suburban office segment finds 50,000 SF available and about 120,000 SF absorbed per year. At that pace the current availability would take about five months to absorb, a figure the appraiser weighs with new construction, returning space and vacancy trends before drawing lease-up conclusions.

absorption rateoffice marketinventory durationavailable spacelease-up
Was this explanation helpful?

More Market Questions

Market analysis confirms that seller financing at 3%, versus a 6% market rate, increased a comparable sale price. What adjustment removes that financing premium?

At the same effective date, reliable value indications support $800,000 for continued use of a property as improved and $500,000 for its cleared site. Immediate demolition costs $100,000. These are the only feasible alternatives, with no other costs or timing differences. Which alternative has the higher net value?

Other relevant conditions equal, growth in the number of households with effective purchasing power in a market tends to have which effect?

In a lakefront market, paired sales show that direct water frontage has the largest price effect of any feature. Which approach to comparable selection best follows from this evidence?

Which circumstance can cause highest and best use as improved to differ from highest and best use as though vacant?

A small group of buyers in a market looks for specialized features that are uncommon in the broader housing supply. What term describes this group?

A neighborhood analysis should include all of the following EXCEPT:

A site legally permits at most 40 units and can physically support 50. Supported comparable analyses find 30 and 40 units financially feasible, with 40 units producing the highest net land value after costs, timing and required return. Which use is maximally productive among these alternatives?

Market evidence isolates a subject value loss from off-site landfill odors. Which listed cause is an external-obsolescence influence?

Which proposed use cannot pass the legal-permissibility screen without evidence that the necessary permission is reasonably probable?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing