After an appraisal assignment is completed, the client requests endorsement of that report for a materially different intended use. What should the appraiser do?
Correct Answer
B) Explain the original use limit and offer a new assignment for the new use
Intended use and users drive the appraisal problem and scope and cannot be retroactively changed in a completed assignment merely by relabeling the report. Explain that the original work was developed for its identified use. A new assignment can address the new intended use and its necessary scope, while using appropriate prior information where supported. This differs from changes identified while an assignment is still in progress, which require reassessment of the ongoing problem and scope.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because intended use is identified based on communication with the client at the time of the assignment and shapes the problem and scope. The appraiser explains that the completed report was developed for its original use and can offer a new assignment for the new use.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Relabel the old report for the new use without reassessing the problem
Option A is wrong because relabeling the old report for the new use without reassessing the problem skips the analysis the new use may require. The original scope was set for a different purpose.
Option C: Treat the later use as included in the original intended use
Option C is wrong because a materially different later use was not part of the original intended use. Treating it as included would misrepresent the assignment.
Option D: Declare the original report void and issue no further work
Option D is wrong because the original report is not void just because the client wants a new use. It remains valid for its original intended use, and new work can be offered.
New use, new assignment
A finished report serves the use it was built for; a different use starts a new job.
How to use: Use this when a client wants to reuse a completed report for another purpose.
Exam Tip
Avoid answers that relabel, retroactively expand or void a completed report.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Readdressing a report for a new use without reassessment
- -Assuming intended use can be expanded after completion
- -Thinking the original report becomes void
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests intended use after an assignment is complete. Intended use is identified at the time of the assignment, so a materially different use calls for a new assignment rather than relabeling.
Background Knowledge
Intended use and intended users drive scope of work. A new assignment can rely on appropriate prior information where supported, while changes discovered during an ongoing assignment are handled by reassessing that assignment's problem and scope.
Real-World Application
A homeowner who ordered an appraisal for estate planning later asks the appraiser to readdress it for a lender's mortgage decision. The appraiser explains the original use and offers a new assignment that meets the lender's requirements.
More USPAP Questions
Under USPAP, what are assignment results?
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
Under 2024 USPAP, which statement correctly combines the requirements for an oral real property appraisal report and its workfile?
An appraiser accepts an assignment involving a property type the appraiser has valued once before, years ago. Competency requires:
A Certified General appraiser is asked to value a specialized industrial property for the first time. The appraiser knows a competency gap exists before agreeing to the assignment. What is required if the appraiser proceeds?
Under 2024 USPAP Standard 1, which listed assignment element must be identified in developing a real property appraisal?
An appraiser provided an appraisal of the same property for another client 18 months ago. No confidentiality obligation prevents disclosing the fact of that service. Before agreeing to a new assignment, the appraiser must:
According to USPAP, what is the primary purpose of the Ethics Rule?
An appraiser is asked to determine 'fair market value' for an assignment. According to USPAP, the appraiser should:
Which list gives the sections of the 2024 USPAP Ethics Rule?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
A client asks the appraiser to remove a verified relevant comparable solely because its supported indication is below the desired value. No new factual defect is identified. What should the appraiser do?
Next Question
Separate property components have individually supported values totaling $900,000. May the appraiser conclude the assembled whole is worth $900,000 solely by addition?