An appraiser receives an assignment to appraise a type of property they have never appraised before. According to the Competency Rule, which action is required?
Correct Answer
B) Gain the competency, or disclose it and take steps
Why this is correct: The USPAP Competency Rule requires an appraiser to be able to perform an assignment competently. If the appraiser lacks competence with an unfamiliar property type, the appraiser may accept the assignment only after disclosing that lack to the client and taking steps to gain competency, such as completing education, obtaining experience, or associating with a competent appraiser. Therefore B is correct. Why the other choices are wrong: A, declining the assignment immediately, is not required; the rule permits disclosure and steps. C, accepting only if the client agrees to a lower fee, is irrelevant to competency and does not cure the lack of knowledge. D, accepting and learning while completing the assignment, violates the rule because the appraiser must disclose the lack of competency and take steps to obtain it; unsupervised on-the-job learning alone is not sufficient. The rule protects the client and the public. Exam tip: Remember the phrase 'disclose and take steps.' If an appraiser lacks competency, the answer is not automatic refusal; it is disclosure plus education, experience, or association with an expert.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C correctly reflects the two-part requirement of the Competency Rule: disclosure and competency development. The rule specifically allows appraisers to accept assignments for unfamiliar property types provided they inform the client of their lack of experience and take concrete steps to become competent. This might include additional training, research, mentoring, or partnering with an experienced appraiser. The rule promotes professional development while maintaining ethical standards and client transparency.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
The DDC Method
DDC = Disclose, Develop, Complete. When facing unfamiliar property types: Disclose your lack of experience to the client, Develop competency through training/mentoring/research, then Complete the assignment competently.
How to use: When you see Competency Rule questions, immediately think DDC. Look for answers that include both disclosure to the client AND steps to gain competency - both elements must be present for the correct answer.
Exam Tip
Competency Rule questions often have 'decline immediately' as a distractor - remember that USPAP encourages professional growth through the disclosure and development pathway.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Thinking appraisers must decline all unfamiliar assignments
- -Forgetting the disclosure requirement to clients
- -Believing competency can only come from prior experience, not education or mentoring
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
The Competency Rule is a fundamental ethical standard in USPAP that requires appraisers to be competent to perform assignments or take specific steps to achieve competency. This rule recognizes that appraisers cannot be experts in every property type but provides a framework for handling unfamiliar assignments ethically. The rule balances professional growth opportunities with client protection by requiring transparency and competency development. It emphasizes that competency can be acquired through education, experience, or collaboration with experts, but must be disclosed to clients when initially lacking.
Background Knowledge
USPAP's Competency Rule is found in the Ethics Rule and requires appraisers to be competent or take steps to become competent before completing an assignment. The rule allows for competency to be gained through education, experience, or association with others who possess the required knowledge.
Real-World Application
An appraiser experienced in residential properties receives an assignment for a gas station. Following the Competency Rule, they would disclose their lack of commercial/special use experience to the client, then take steps like completing specialized education, researching comparable sales, or partnering with an experienced commercial appraiser before proceeding.
More USPAP Questions
Which statement best defines a hypothetical condition under USPAP?
According to the Competency Rule, if an appraiser lacks the knowledge and experience to complete an assignment competently, which action is NOT acceptable?
An appraiser runs only the sales comparison approach on a standard tract home and omits the cost and income approaches. Under Standard 1 this is:
A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
A hypothetical condition differs from an extraordinary assumption in that a hypothetical condition:
An appraiser must disclose in the certification whether they have:
A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam