An appraiser is valuing a property where a comparable sale occurred 8 months ago for $275,000. Market conditions have been appreciating at 0.5% per month. What time-adjusted price should be used for the comparable?
Correct Answer
C) $286,000
Why this is correct: The comparable sold in the past and the market has appreciated, so adjust its old price upward to the current date. Total change is 0.5% × 8 = 4%; $275,000 × 1.04 = $286,000. Why the other choices are wrong: No adjustment ignores market change; a downward adjustment reverses the direction; $291,000 applies too large an increase. Exam tip: Past comparable in an appreciating market: adjust upward to the present.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because when the market appreciates 0.5% per month for 8 months, the total appreciation is 4% (0.5% × 8 = 4%). Since the comparable sold for $275,000 after this appreciation occurred, we must work backwards to find what it would be worth at the subject property's effective date. We divide $275,000 by 1.04 (representing the 4% appreciation factor) to get $264,423, which rounds to $264,000. This downward adjustment correctly reflects that the comparable would be worth less in today's market conditions.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
TIME TRAVEL RULE
Remember 'DIVIDE to go BACK in time, MULTIPLY to go FORWARD in time.' When a comparable sale happened in an appreciating market, you're going back to find current equivalent value, so DIVIDE by the appreciation factor (1 + rate).
How to use: When you see a time adjustment question, first identify the direction: Are you adjusting a past sale to current conditions (DIVIDE) or projecting current value to future conditions (MULTIPLY)? Then calculate the total appreciation/depreciation factor and apply the appropriate operation.
Exam Tip
Always double-check the direction of your time adjustment - this is the most commonly missed aspect of these questions. If the market went up since the sale, the adjusted value should be lower than the original sale price.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Multiplying instead of dividing when adjusting past sales in appreciating markets
- -Forgetting to convert the monthly rate to total appreciation over the time period
- -Applying the percentage directly rather than using the appreciation factor (1 + rate)
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the critical concept of time adjustments in the sales comparison approach, specifically how to adjust comparable sales for market appreciation or depreciation. When a comparable sale occurred in the past and the market has appreciated since then, the appraiser must adjust the sale price downward to reflect what that property would have sold for at the time of the original transaction. The key insight is understanding the directional relationship: if the market has gone up since the sale, the comparable's current equivalent value would be lower than what it sold for. This requires dividing by the appreciation factor rather than multiplying, which is counterintuitive to many students.
Background Knowledge
Time adjustments in appraisal require understanding that comparable sales must be adjusted to reflect market conditions as of the effective date of the appraisal. When markets appreciate between the sale date and appraisal date, the comparable's sale price must be adjusted downward to reflect current purchasing power. The mathematical relationship involves either multiplying by an appreciation factor (for future projections) or dividing by it (for backward adjustments to current conditions).
Real-World Application
In practice, appraisers regularly encounter comparable sales that occurred months before the appraisal date. They must research market trends, analyze price appreciation rates from MLS data or market studies, and apply time adjustments to ensure all comparables reflect value as of the same date, making the analysis meaningful and defensible.
More Sales Comparison Questions
A property generates $85,000 in Net Operating Income and sells for $1,062,500. What is the overall capitalization rate?
A property has potential gross income of $180,000, vacancy and collection loss of $15,000, and operating expenses of $65,000. What is the Net Operating Income?
A comparable sale occurred 8 months ago for $425,000. Market conditions indicate property values have increased 0.5% per month since that time. What is the adjusted sale price?
A property generates $150,000 in potential gross income. Market data indicates a 7% vacancy rate and operating expenses of 35% of effective gross income. If the cap rate is 9.5%, what is the indicated value?
A property sold for $320,000 one year ago. If market conditions have improved by 6% since that sale, what is the time-adjusted sale price for comparison purposes?
A commercial building cost $2,500,000 to construct. The land value is $600,000. If the building has suffered 15% physical deterioration and 8% functional obsolescence, what is the depreciated cost of the improvements?
A building's gross rent multiplier (GRM) is 120. If the monthly rent is $2,500, what is the indicated value?
In the cost approach, economic obsolescence is characterized as:
The concept of regression in property values means that:
A commercial property has potential gross income of $120,000, vacancy and collection loss of 8%, and operating expenses of $35,000. Using a cap rate of 9.5%, what is the indicated value?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
A comparable sold for $296,000 and its adjustments total $44,400 without regard to sign. What is the gross adjustment as a percentage of the sale price?
Next Question
The market supports $75.00 per square foot for differences in gross living area. A comparable containing 2,000 square feet sold for $290,000; the subject contains 2,100 square feet. What is the comparable’s adjusted price?