EstatePass
USPAPMEDIUM18.2% of exam

A reviewer asks why a report used three comps rather than six. The Standard 2 answer is that a report must contain:

Correct Answer

D) Enough information for intended users to understand the report

USPAP requires sufficient reporting for intended users and adequate development for credible results; it does not prescribe a universal count of three or six comparables. A program or assignment may have additional requirements that need separate consideration.

Answer Options
A
A minimum of six closed comparables in a residential assignment
B
The comparables that the report software template provides
C
As many comparables as the report appendix can hold
D
Enough information for intended users to understand the report

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option D is correct because Standard 2 requires a report to contain sufficient information to enable the intended users to understand it properly. USPAP does not set a fixed count of three or six comparables. Program or client requirements may add specific expectations, but the USPAP answer is sufficiency for users.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: A minimum of six closed comparables in a residential assignment

Option A is wrong because USPAP does not require a minimum of six closed comparables in a residential assignment. No universal comparable count appears in USPAP.

Option B: The comparables that the report software template provides

Option B is wrong because the comparables that the report software template provides do not define what is needed. A template's fields are not a USPAP standard.

Option C: As many comparables as the report appendix can hold

Option C is wrong because including as many comparables as the report appendix can hold confuses quantity with sufficiency. More data does not by itself make a report understandable or credible.

USPAP counts sufficiency, not comps

USPAP asks whether users can understand the report, not whether it shows a set number of comps.

How to use: Use this to reject options citing a fixed number of comparables as a USPAP rule.

Exam Tip

Be wary of options that state a specific number of comparables as a USPAP requirement.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Thinking USPAP sets a minimum number of comparables
  • -Treating a software template as a standard
  • -Assuming more comparables always means a better report

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests whether USPAP prescribes a number of comparables. It does not; Standard 2 requires reports to contain sufficient information for intended users to understand them, and Standard 1 requires adequate development for credible results. The answer should reflect that sufficiency standard.

Background Knowledge

USPAP is a performance standard rather than a checklist of counts or forms. The appraiser determines what data are needed for credible results and reports enough for intended users. Lenders or government programs may impose their own minimums as assignment conditions.

Real-World Application

In a rural area with few sales, an appraiser uses three well-verified comparables and explains the scarcity of data and how each sale relates to the subject. A reviewer questioning the count is directed to that explanation.

comparable countsufficient informationStandard 2intended usersappraisal review
Was this explanation helpful?

More USPAP Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing