A property's highest and best use analysis concluded that the existing improvements should be demolished and the site redeveloped. In this case, the existing improvements:
Correct Answer
C) May have negative value if demolition costs exceed any salvage value
When supported highest and best use calls for immediate demolition, existing improvements can impose a negative contribution if removal costs exceed salvage benefits. Replacement or reproduction cost does not establish their present contribution, and zero is not automatic. Quantification must reflect the actual removal, salvage and other relevant timing or project effects rather than an unconditional formula for every redevelopment case.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because when demolition is the supported highest and best use, the existing improvements can have negative value if removal costs exceed any salvage value. Agency guidance states the cost of demolition and site preparation should be considered when the highest and best use is development to a different use. The actual removal costs, salvage and timing determine the amount.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Should be valued at their replacement cost
Option A, valuing the improvements at their replacement cost, is wrong because replacement cost measures what it would cost to build a substitute, not what an improvement that is about to be demolished contributes to value.
Option B: Contribute nothing to value, with the demolition cost left out of the analysis
Option B, saying the improvements contribute nothing with the demolition cost left out, is wrong because demolition costs must be considered in the analysis. When removal costs exceed salvage, the contribution is negative rather than zero.
Option D: Should be valued at their reproduction cost new
Option D, valuing the improvements at their reproduction cost new, is wrong because reproduction cost new measures the cost of an exact replica, which is irrelevant when the building's highest and best use is removal.
Teardown can cost you
If it costs more to knock it down than you get back in salvage, the old building subtracts from value.
How to use: Use this when a question asks what an improvement slated for demolition contributes.
Exam Tip
When demolition is highest and best use, look for the answer that accounts for removal costs; zero is not the automatic answer.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Assigning the improvements their cost new
- -Assuming the improvements contribute exactly zero
- -Leaving demolition costs out of the analysis
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests how existing improvements are treated when highest and best use calls for demolition and redevelopment. The improvements no longer contribute through continued use, and removing them has a cost. If demolition costs exceed salvage value, the improvements have a negative contribution to the property's value.
Background Knowledge
When the land as if vacant is worth more than the property as improved, demolition may be the highest and best use. The value of the property then reflects land value less the cost to remove the improvements, plus any salvage. Cost new figures do not measure the contribution of improvements that are slated for removal.
Real-World Application
An appraiser values a site where an obsolete small house stands on land now best suited for townhomes. The appraiser obtains demolition and site-clearing estimates, subtracts the net removal cost after salvage from the land value, and explains the analysis in the report.
More Property Description Questions
Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?
Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?
Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:
Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?
Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?
When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:
A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?
In reconciliation, an appraiser should:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam