Available site information flags a potential wetland that could materially affect the proposed development. What follow-up is appropriate before concluding its development/value effect?
Correct Answer
C) Get a qualified delineation and the permit requirements
If the potential wetland materially affects the proposed use or assignment, obtain appropriate qualified delineation information and determine applicable jurisdiction/permit constraints as needed. Presence and regulatory jurisdiction are separate questions. Neither total unbuildability nor a standard discount follows merely from a possible wetland observation.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because a qualified delineation and the applicable permit requirements are needed to know the wetland's extent and regulatory constraints. The EPA and the Corps of Engineers use delineation manuals to define wetlands for the Clean Water Act Section 404 permit program. With that information, the appraiser can analyze the effect on the proposed development.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Assume that the whole property is unbuildable
Option A assumes the whole property is unbuildable. A possible wetland may affect only part of a site or may be permitted with conditions, so total unbuildability does not follow from a flag alone.
Option B: Apply a fixed environmental discount to the land value
Option B applies a fixed environmental discount to land value. Any effect depends on the delineated area, the permit constraints and market evidence, so a standard discount is not supported.
Option D: Ignore it, because the wetland identification is uncertain
Option D ignores the wetland because identification is uncertain. Uncertainty is a reason to investigate, especially when the wetland could materially affect the proposed development.
Delineate before you value
First find out where the wetland is and what the permits allow, then decide what it does to value.
How to use: Use this when a question asks what to do about a possible wetland.
Exam Tip
Pick the answer that gets qualified delineation and regulatory information rather than one that assumes the worst, ignores the issue or applies a set discount.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Assuming a possible wetland makes the whole site unbuildable
- -Applying a standard percentage discount without evidence
- -Ignoring a wetland flag because its presence is not yet confirmed
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the response to a possible wetland that could affect development. Whether a wetland is present and whether it is regulated are separate questions answered through qualified delineation and permit research. The appraiser should get that information before concluding the effect on development or value.
Background Knowledge
Wetlands are identified through field delineation using soil, vegetation and hydrology criteria. Federal, state and local rules may restrict filling or developing wetlands and may require permits or mitigation. Because these limits affect legally permissible and physically possible uses, they matter for highest and best use and value.
Real-World Application
An appraiser values acreage planned for a subdivision, and a mapping service shows a possible wetland along a creek. The appraiser asks the client for a delineation and permit information. Once the delineation shows a small regulated area along the creek, the appraiser analyzes the remaining developable land.
More Property Description Questions
A local zoning ordinance allows these maximum densities: R-1, 4 units per acre; R-2, 8 units per acre; R-4, 20 units per acre; PUD (with approval), 12 units per acre. Which category allows the highest density?
What design advantage is commonly associated with post-and-beam construction?
A hypothetical local ordinance permits either a single-family house or duplex on the site. The existing single-family house complies with all current rules. Which statement is supported?
A zoning variance allowing a reduced side setback is granted for a parcel. After the parcel is sold, who generally holds the benefit of the variance, subject to its conditions?
Under ANSI Z765-2021 as applied by Fannie Mae, a staircase runs from the second floor down to the first floor. Its area is counted as part of:
Under ANSI Z765-2021, as Fannie Mae requires for a detached house, where are exterior dimensions taken on a brick-veneer wall?
A building's HVAC system would be classified as which type of building component?
A home on a large tract is valued at $620,000 including the land it needs. The remaining excess land could be sold separately and contributes a net $95,000 after separation costs. What is the total indicated value?
A covered sale concerns a residence built in 1965. Which hazard is the subject of the federal pre 1978 housing disclosure rule, without assuming its actual presence?
Which site characteristic is most likely to reduce site utility by restricting where a typical dwelling can be placed?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
A commercial site has access only through a private road that crosses neighboring property. This access is documented by a recorded easement. How does this affect the site's marketability?
Next Question
Which evidence best supports estimating a roof’s remaining service life, rather than assuming one material always lasts longest?