A comparable’s verified price is $305,000 and evidence establishes a $5,000 concession-induced price increase. Its consistently measured comparison area is 2000 sqft. What is the normalized cash-equivalent sale price per square foot?
Correct Answer
B) $150.00 per sqft
(305000 − 5000) / 2000 = 150 dollars per sqft. Normalize the supported price effect before unitizing. This unit price is not automatically a marginal area adjustment.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because the concession-induced increase must be removed before unitizing: ($305,000 - $5,000) / 2,000 = $150.00 per square foot. This gives a cash-equivalent unit price on a consistent basis. Note that this average unit price is not automatically the same as a marginal adjustment rate for size differences.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: $152.50 per sqft
Option A is wrong because $152.50 per sqft comes from dividing the unadjusted $305,000 by 2,000 square feet. It skips removing the $5,000 concession effect; the correct figure is ($305,000 - $5,000) / 2,000 = $150.00.
Option C: $155.00 per sqft
Option C is wrong because $155.00 per sqft results from adding the $5,000 instead of subtracting it: ($305,000 + $5,000) / 2,000 = $155.00. Since the concession inflated the price, it must be deducted, giving $150.00.
Option D: $2.50 per sqft
Option D is wrong because $2.50 per sqft is only the concession amount spread over the area, $5,000 / 2,000. It is not a sale price per square foot; the normalized figure is $300,000 / 2,000 = $150.00.
Clean the price, then divide
First strip out the concession effect from the price, then divide by the area. Dividing a dirty price spreads the distortion into the unit rate.
How to use: Use this order whenever a question combines a concession or financing effect with a unit-of-comparison calculation.
Exam Tip
Check the direction of the concession effect: if it increased the price, subtract it before computing any unit price.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Computing price per square foot before removing the concession effect
- -Adding the concession amount instead of subtracting it
- -Treating an average price per square foot as the marginal size adjustment rate
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the order of operations: normalize the sale price for the supported concession effect first, then convert to a unit price. The concession raised the price by $5,000, so the cash-equivalent price is $305,000 - $5,000 = $300,000. Dividing by 2,000 square feet gives $150.00 per square foot.
Background Knowledge
Cash equivalency adjusts a sale price to remove the effect of non-market financing or concessions so comparables are on a common basis. Fannie Mae does not accept positive adjustments for sales or financing concessions; the adjustment reflects the price inflation, which is deducted. Units of comparison, such as price per square foot, are calculated after the price is normalized.
Real-World Application
A comparable sold for $305,000 with seller-paid costs that verification shows pushed the price up by $5,000. The appraiser records a $300,000 cash-equivalent price and uses $150 per square foot when comparing unit prices across sales.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?
Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?
Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:
Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?
Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?
When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:
A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?
In reconciliation, an appraiser should:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
