EstatePass
AgencyAgency_typesMEDIUM

During a multiple representation transaction in Wisconsin where no designated agency has been established, Broker Davis represents both seller Linda and buyer Mark. Mark asks Broker Davis what the lowest price Linda would accept. Under Wisconsin law, how should Broker Davis respond?

Correct Answer

B) Davis should refuse to disclose Linda's confidential information to Mark because of the duty of confidentiality owed to Linda

Under Wisconsin Administrative Code REEB 24, even in a multiple representation relationship, the broker retains the duty of confidentiality to each client. The broker may not disclose one client's confidential information — such as the seller's minimum acceptable price — to the other client. This is one of the key limitations of multiple representation: the broker cannot provide the same level of undivided advocacy as in single agency, and confidential information of each party must be protected.

Answer Options
A
Davis should disclose Linda's minimum acceptable price because full disclosure is required to both clients
B
Davis should refuse to disclose Linda's confidential information to Mark because of the duty of confidentiality owed to Linda
C
Davis should disclose the information only if Mark specifically asks in writing
D
Davis may disclose the information because multiple representation eliminates confidentiality obligations

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Agency Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Agency Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

multiple_representationconfidentialityREEB_24fiduciary_duties

Related Concepts

The highest legal obligation of trust and confidence owed by an agent to their principal, requiring the agent to act solely in the principal's best interest.

An agency relationship where the agent agrees to act on behalf of the principal without receiving compensation.

An agency relationship created by the conduct or actions of the parties rather than by a written or oral agreement.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Agency Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Agency Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing