EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateState_specificEASY

Maria rents an apartment in Richmond, Virginia for $1,500 per month. Her landlord, Mr. Nguyen, asks her to pay a security deposit of $3,500 before moving in. Under the Virginia Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, which of the following best describes this situation?

Correct Answer

A) The deposit is impermissible because it exceeds the two-month statutory maximum of $3,000.

Under Va. Code § 55.1-1226, the maximum security deposit a Virginia landlord may collect is two months' periodic rent. For Maria's $1,500/month tenancy, the cap is $3,000. A deposit of $3,500 exceeds this statutory maximum and is therefore impermissible, regardless of any written agreement between the parties.

Answer Options
A
The deposit is impermissible because it exceeds the two-month statutory maximum of $3,000.
B
The deposit is impermissible because Virginia prohibits any security deposit exceeding one month's rent.
C
The deposit is permissible because it does not exceed three months' rent.
D
The deposit is permissible because the landlord and tenant may agree to any deposit amount in writing.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

security_depositvrltadeposit_limitlandlord_obligations

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing