EstatePass
AgencyAgency_typesHARD

Minnesota broker Linda has three salespersons: Alex represents the seller, Brenda represents the buyer, and Carl is acting as a facilitator for a third unrelated party in a different transaction. Alex and Brenda are both involved in the SAME in-house transaction. Linda has a written designated agency policy. Which party is considered a dual agent in this transaction under Minnesota law?

Correct Answer

C) Linda, the broker, because her firm represents both parties through her salespersons

Under Minnesota law, when a brokerage firm represents both the buyer and seller in the same transaction through designated salespersons, the supervising broker (Linda) is considered the dual agent. Alex and Brenda each serve as designated agents for their respective clients and owe full fiduciary duties to their own client only. However, Linda, as the broker responsible for both salespersons and both sides of the transaction, occupies the dual agent position. This must be disclosed to and consented to by both parties.

Answer Options
A
Alex only, because he holds the listing
B
Both Alex and Brenda, because they each represent one party in the same transaction
C
Linda, the broker, because her firm represents both parties through her salespersons
D
No one, because designated agency eliminates dual agency within a brokerage

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Agency Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Agency Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

designated_agencydual_agencysupervising_brokerin_house_transactioncomplex_scenario

Related Concepts

An agency relationship created by a clear, explicit agreement between the principal and agent, either orally or in writing.

The highest legal obligation of trust and confidence owed by an agent to their principal, requiring the agent to act solely in the principal's best interest.

An agency relationship where the agent agrees to act on behalf of the principal without receiving compensation.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Agency Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Agency Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing