EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateLicense LawHARD

A Massachusetts real estate broker, Angela, operates as a sole proprietor. She lists a property for a seller and, during the transaction, discovers that her buyer client (with whom she has a separate buyer agency agreement) is interested in purchasing that same property. Angela wants to proceed as a dual agent. Under Massachusetts law and 254 CMR 3.00, which of the following is the most accurate statement about Angela's obligations before proceeding as a dual agent in this specific scenario?

Correct Answer

B) Angela must obtain informed written consent from both the seller and the buyer specifically acknowledging the dual agency before proceeding

Under 254 CMR 3.00, Massachusetts permits dual agency but requires that both the seller and the buyer provide informed written consent to the dual agency relationship before the broker proceeds in that capacity. The initial agency disclosure form provided at the first meeting is not sufficient consent to dual agency — it merely informs clients that dual agency is a possible relationship. When the actual dual agency situation arises, Angela must obtain specific written consent from both parties acknowledging and agreeing to the dual agency. Without this specific consent, proceeding as a dual agent violates BORREBS regulations.

Answer Options
A
Angela may proceed as a dual agent immediately because she already provided agency disclosure forms at the first meeting with each client
B
Angela must obtain informed written consent from both the seller and the buyer specifically acknowledging the dual agency before proceeding
C
Angela must designate one of her salespersons to represent each party separately, as sole proprietors cannot legally practice dual agency in Massachusetts
D
Angela must withdraw from representing one of the parties before proceeding, as Massachusetts prohibits dual agency when both clients are represented under signed agency agreements

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

dual_agencywritten_consent254_cmr_3agency_disclosuresole_proprietor

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing