EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateLicense_lawHARD

Broker Helen is found by CREC to have violated both the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) and CGS § 20-321 in connection with a fraudulent listing. CREC imposes a license revocation. Helen argues that because CUTPA is enforced by the courts, CREC has no authority to use a CUTPA violation as a basis for license revocation. Is Helen's argument correct under Connecticut law?

Correct Answer

B) No, because CREC may independently determine that conduct violating CUTPA also constitutes a violation of license law grounds for discipline under CGS § 20-321

CREC's disciplinary authority under CGS § 20-321 is independent of CUTPA enforcement. Conduct that violates CUTPA—such as fraudulent or deceptive acts in a real estate transaction—may simultaneously constitute a violation of license law grounds for discipline. CREC does not need a court CUTPA judgment to act; it can independently find that the same underlying conduct warrants license revocation under Chapter 392.

Answer Options
A
Yes, because CUTPA violations are exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Connecticut Superior Court and cannot be used by CREC
B
No, because CREC may independently determine that conduct violating CUTPA also constitutes a violation of license law grounds for discipline under CGS § 20-321
C
Yes, because only the Connecticut Attorney General can refer CUTPA violations to CREC for disciplinary purposes
D
No, but CREC may only issue a fine for CUTPA-related conduct and cannot revoke a license on those grounds

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

disciplinary_actionsCUTPACREC_authoritylicense_revocationconcurrent_jurisdiction

Related Concepts

Market allocation is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to divide markets among themselves by geographic area, property type, or price range, thereby eliminating competition.

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing