EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateLicense LawHARD

In a licensing seminar in Phoenix, a broker begins representing both buyer and seller in the same transaction without obtaining prior written consent from both parties. Which outcome best matches current Arizona practice?

Correct Answer

D) acting for more than one party without the required informed written consent is disciplinary conduct in Arizona

Under A.R.S. § 32-2153; A.A.C. R4-28-1101(F), acting for more than one party without the required informed written consent is disciplinary conduct in Arizona.

Answer Options
A
dual representation never requires consent if the brokerage is large
B
only salespersons need written consent and brokers do not
C
consent is needed only after close of escrow under current Arizona law
D
acting for more than one party without the required informed written consent is disciplinary conduct in Arizona

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

arizona_specificdisciplinedual_agency_consentdisciplinary_processadre_commissioner_and_licensing

Related Concepts

Antitrust violations in real estate occur when competing brokerages or agents engage in practices that restrain trade, reduce competition, or harm consumers through collusion. These violations are governed by the Sherman Antitrust Act and can result in severe penalties.

Broker supervision is the legal obligation of a designated or managing broker to oversee and be accountable for the real estate activities of all salespersons and associate brokers operating under their license.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds, while conversion is the unauthorized use of client funds for the broker's own benefit. Both are serious violations that can result in license revocation.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing