An appraiser is delineating the geographic competitive market for an office property. Which item, taken alone, provides the least direct evidence of that market?
Correct Answer
A) The exterior cladding material of one building
Office market delineation uses actual tenant and buyer substitution, accessibility, location, class and other supported drivers. Exterior materials alone ordinarily provide less direct geographic evidence, but can still influence quality or utility when the market supports that effect.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because the exterior cladding material of a single building, standing alone, says little about where tenants or buyers actually look and substitute. Office market delineation relies on supported drivers such as tenant substitution, location choices, accessibility and building class, though materials can still affect quality or utility when the market supports that effect.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: Verified tenant substitution among building classes
Option B is wrong because verified tenant substitution among building classes is direct evidence of which buildings compete with each other. It shows actual market behavior used to define the competitive market.
Option C: Business-district location choices shown by leases
Option C is wrong because business-district location choices shown by leases reveal where tenants actually choose to locate. That is direct geographic evidence of the competitive market area.
Option D: Travel access and transport corridors used by tenants
Option D is wrong because travel access and transport corridors used by tenants help define how far the competitive area extends. Accessibility is a recognized driver of office market boundaries, so it is not the least direct evidence.
Follow the tenants, not facades
Market boundaries come from where tenants and buyers actually go and substitute, not from what one building's facade is made of.
How to use: Use this to rank evidence by how directly it shows tenant or buyer behavior.
Exam Tip
When asked for the weakest market-area evidence, choose the isolated physical detail over choices describing actual tenant behavior, location or access.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Defining a market area by building materials or appearance alone
- -Ignoring actual tenant substitution evidence
- -Overlooking access and transport corridors when setting boundaries
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests what kind of evidence helps delineate an office competitive market. Market areas are defined by actual tenant and buyer behavior, such as substitution, location choices and access, so the task is to find the datum that says least about that behavior.
Background Knowledge
A market area is the geographic region from which most demand comes and in which most competing properties are located. For office property, delineation rests on how tenants and buyers actually substitute among buildings, which locations they choose, and the access they rely on. Physical features of one building say more about its quality than about the boundaries of the market.
Real-World Application
An appraiser valuing a suburban office building studies leases showing tenants moving between Class A and Class B buildings along a highway corridor. That substitution and access evidence shapes the competitive market, while the subject's brick exterior is considered only as part of its quality rating.
More Market Questions
Market analysis confirms that seller financing at 3%, versus a 6% market rate, increased a comparable sale price. What adjustment removes that financing premium?
At the same effective date, reliable value indications support $800,000 for continued use of a property as improved and $500,000 for its cleared site. Immediate demolition costs $100,000. These are the only feasible alternatives, with no other costs or timing differences. Which alternative has the higher net value?
Other relevant conditions equal, growth in the number of households with effective purchasing power in a market tends to have which effect?
In a lakefront market, paired sales show that direct water frontage has the largest price effect of any feature. Which approach to comparable selection best follows from this evidence?
Which circumstance can cause highest and best use as improved to differ from highest and best use as though vacant?
A small group of buyers in a market looks for specialized features that are uncommon in the broader housing supply. What term describes this group?
A neighborhood analysis should include all of the following EXCEPT:
A site legally permits at most 40 units and can physically support 50. Supported comparable analyses find 30 and 40 units financially feasible, with 40 units producing the highest net land value after costs, timing and required return. Which use is maximally productive among these alternatives?
Market evidence isolates a subject value loss from off-site landfill odors. Which listed cause is an external-obsolescence influence?
Which proposed use cannot pass the legal-permissibility screen without evidence that the necessary permission is reasonably probable?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
A verified rental-market series excludes seasonal and uninhabitable units. Its available vacancy rate persistently rises to 25%, well above that segment’s supported historical equilibrium, with no measurement change. What concern should be investigated first?
Next Question
Five competitive sales closed in the past year with days on market of 60, 90, 100, 150 and 200. What is the mean (average) days on market?