EstatePass
Sales ComparisonEASY16.4% of exam

Verified effective ages are 12 years for the subject and 18 years for the comparable. Market evidence supports an upward $2,400 per year when adjusting the older comparable to the subject’s lower effective age over this range. What signed adjustment results?

Correct Answer

A) $14,400

(18 − 12) × 2400 = +14400. The exercise supplies effective ages and an applicable contribution rate; actual construction age alone would not establish this adjustment.

Answer Options
A
$14,400
B
−$14,400
C
$43,200
D
$28,800

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option A is correct because the effective age difference is 18 − 12 = 6 years, and 6 × $2,400 = $14,400. The comparable is older and inferior to the subject, so the adjustment is positive. The stem provides effective ages and a supported market rate for this range.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option B: −$14,400

Option B shows −$14,400, which uses the correct amount but the wrong sign. The older comparable is inferior to the subject, so it is adjusted upward by +$14,400.

Option C: $43,200

Option C shows $43,200, which multiplies the comparable's full effective age by the rate: 18 × $2,400 = $43,200. Only the 6-year difference is adjusted, giving 6 × $2,400 = $14,400.

Option D: $28,800

Option D shows $28,800, which multiplies the subject's effective age by the rate: 12 × $2,400 = $28,800. The adjustment uses the difference between ages, (18 − 12) × $2,400 = $14,400.

Multiply the gap, not the age

Age adjustments use the difference between the two effective ages times the rate.

How to use: Use this to avoid multiplying a whole age by the rate.

Exam Tip

Check the sign last: an older or worse comparable gets a plus adjustment toward a newer or better subject.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Using a negative sign for an inferior comparable
  • -Multiplying the full effective age instead of the difference
  • -Using actual age when effective age is what the market reacts to

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests effective age adjustment arithmetic and sign. The comparable is older in effective age than the subject, so it is inferior and adjusts upward. The adjustment is the age difference times the supported rate.

Background Knowledge

Effective age reflects a property's condition and utility rather than its chronological age. Adjustments for age or condition differences should be based on market evidence. Adjustments are made to the comparable, upward when it is inferior and downward when it is superior.

Real-World Application

An appraiser rates the subject at an effective age of 12 years after recent updates and a comparable at 18 years. Paired sales show about $2,400 per year of effective age in this range, so she adds $14,400 to the comparable.

effective ageage adjustmentadjustment directionconditionsales comparison grid
Was this explanation helpful?

More Sales Comparison Questions

Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?

Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?

Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?

Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?

The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:

Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?

Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?

When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:

A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?

In reconciliation, an appraiser should:

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing