Market conditions analysis shows that average days on market for similar properties has increased from 45 days to 90 days over the past year. This trend indicates:
Correct Answer
A) Longer selling times warrant checking for weaker seller leverage
For consistent comparable samples, 45 to 90 observed days indicates longer selling durations. Investigate possible weaker seller leverage along with composition, seasonality, list pricing and inventory. DOM alone does not quantify a price change or future marketing time.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because days on market for similar properties rising from 45 to 90 days shows longer selling times, a sign that seller leverage may be weakening and should be investigated. Market conditions analysis tracks this trend alongside other indicators rather than treating it as proof of a cause or a price change. The appraiser should also consider composition, seasonality, list pricing and inventory.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: No observed timing measure changed during the year at all
Option B is wrong because days on market itself is a timing measure, and it rose from 45 to 90 days. Saying no timing measure changed ignores the data.
Option C: A seasonal cause is proven, even without any supporting market data
Option C is wrong because a seasonal cause cannot be proven without supporting market data. Seasonality is one possible explanation to investigate, not a conclusion.
Option D: Seller bargaining strength is proven to have increased
Option D is wrong because longer days on market points toward possibly weaker seller bargaining strength, not stronger. Nothing here proves seller leverage increased.
Slower sales, softer sellers
When homes sit longer, sellers usually have less bargaining power, so check whether the market is softening.
How to use: Use this when a question gives a change in days on market and asks what it suggests.
Exam Tip
Prefer answers that call for investigating a trend over answers that claim a single statistic proves a cause.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating longer days on market as stronger seller leverage
- -Concluding a cause without supporting data
- -Converting a days-on-market change directly into a price adjustment
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests how to interpret rising days on market. Doubling from 45 to 90 days for consistent samples means properties are taking longer to sell. That warrants checking for weaker seller leverage alongside other explanations, but it does not prove a cause or a price change by itself.
Background Knowledge
Days on market and marketing time are indicators of market balance. Longer times often suggest more supply relative to demand or overpricing, while shorter times suggest tighter conditions. These indicators support, but do not by themselves quantify, price trends or adjustments.
Real-World Application
An appraiser sees that typical days on market in the subject's area doubled over the year. She checks whether list prices rose, whether more inventory came on, and whether sale-to-list ratios fell before reporting lengthening marketing times in her market conditions analysis.
More Market Questions
Market analysis confirms that seller financing at 3%, versus a 6% market rate, increased a comparable sale price. What adjustment removes that financing premium?
At the same effective date, reliable value indications support $800,000 for continued use of a property as improved and $500,000 for its cleared site. Immediate demolition costs $100,000. These are the only feasible alternatives, with no other costs or timing differences. Which alternative has the higher net value?
Other relevant conditions equal, growth in the number of households with effective purchasing power in a market tends to have which effect?
In a lakefront market, paired sales show that direct water frontage has the largest price effect of any feature. Which approach to comparable selection best follows from this evidence?
Which circumstance can cause highest and best use as improved to differ from highest and best use as though vacant?
A small group of buyers in a market looks for specialized features that are uncommon in the broader housing supply. What term describes this group?
A neighborhood analysis should include all of the following EXCEPT:
A site legally permits at most 40 units and can physically support 50. Supported comparable analyses find 30 and 40 units financially feasible, with 40 units producing the highest net land value after costs, timing and required return. Which use is maximally productive among these alternatives?
Market evidence isolates a subject value loss from off-site landfill odors. Which listed cause is an external-obsolescence influence?
Which proposed use cannot pass the legal-permissibility screen without evidence that the necessary permission is reasonably probable?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam