At the same effective date, three legally permissible, physically possible and financially feasible alternatives have supported net land indications after all costs, with comparable timing and risk: gas station $500,000; fast food restaurant $650,000; strip retail center $725,000. Which is maximally productive among those alternatives?
Correct Answer
A) Strip retail center, with the highest supported net land value
All three stated alternatives pass legal, physical and financial tests on a comparable risk, timing and cost basis. The strip retail center has the highest supported net land value, $725,000, and is maximally productive among those alternatives. Highest gross income alone would not establish this conclusion.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because the strip retail center produces the highest supported net land value, $725,000, compared with $650,000 for the fast food restaurant and $500,000 for the gas station. Since the alternatives have comparable timing and risk, the highest residual land value identifies the maximally productive use. That is the use that satisfies the last of the four highest and best use tests.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: Fast food restaurant, despite its lower land indication
Option B, the fast food restaurant, indicates a land value of $650,000, which is lower than the strip retail center's $725,000. A lower residual land value on a comparable risk basis does not make it maximally productive.
Option C: Gas station, despite its lower land indication
Option C, the gas station, has the lowest net land indication, $500,000. It is financially feasible but produces less land value than either other alternative, so it is not the maximally productive use.
Option D: All alternatives, because financial feasibility implies equal value
Option D is wrong because passing the financial feasibility test does not mean all feasible uses produce equal value. The alternatives produce $500,000, $650,000 and $725,000, and the maximal productivity test selects the one with the highest land value.
Legal, Physical, Financial, Maximal
Think of four gates in order: legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible, then maximally productive. Only uses that clear the first three gates compete at the last one, where the highest land value wins.
How to use: Use this sequence to decide which test a highest and best use question is asking about.
Exam Tip
When alternatives are stated to have comparable risk and timing, pick the highest residual land value. Do not choose a use based on highest gross income or lowest cost alone.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Choosing the use with the highest gross income rather than the highest net land value
- -Assuming all financially feasible uses are equally productive
- -Applying the maximal productivity test before confirming legal permissibility
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the final test of highest and best use, maximal productivity. All three alternatives have already passed the legal, physical and financial feasibility tests, and their timing and risk are comparable. Among financially feasible uses, the one producing the highest residual land value is maximally productive.
Background Knowledge
Highest and best use is the legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive use. The tests are applied in sequence, so maximal productivity compares only those uses that have passed the first three. The use that produces the highest residual land value, on a risk-adjusted basis, is the highest and best use of the land as though vacant.
Real-World Application
An appraiser analyzes a commercial corner lot zoned for several retail uses. After confirming each use is allowed, fits the site and is feasible, the appraiser compares residual land values from development models. The use producing the highest risk-adjusted land value is concluded as highest and best use as though vacant.
More Land/Site Questions
Market analysis confirms that seller financing at 3%, versus a 6% market rate, increased a comparable sale price. What adjustment removes that financing premium?
At the same effective date, reliable value indications support $800,000 for continued use of a property as improved and $500,000 for its cleared site. Immediate demolition costs $100,000. These are the only feasible alternatives, with no other costs or timing differences. Which alternative has the higher net value?
Other relevant conditions equal, growth in the number of households with effective purchasing power in a market tends to have which effect?
In a lakefront market, paired sales show that direct water frontage has the largest price effect of any feature. Which approach to comparable selection best follows from this evidence?
Which circumstance can cause highest and best use as improved to differ from highest and best use as though vacant?
A small group of buyers in a market looks for specialized features that are uncommon in the broader housing supply. What term describes this group?
A neighborhood analysis should include all of the following EXCEPT:
A site legally permits at most 40 units and can physically support 50. Supported comparable analyses find 30 and 40 units financially feasible, with 40 units producing the highest net land value after costs, timing and required return. Which use is maximally productive among these alternatives?
Market evidence isolates a subject value loss from off-site landfill odors. Which listed cause is an external-obsolescence influence?
Which proposed use cannot pass the legal-permissibility screen without evidence that the necessary permission is reasonably probable?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam