In a narrative appraisal report, the appraiser must include a detailed discussion of the approaches to value used. If the cost approach was not used for a 30-year-old residential property, the appraiser must:
Correct Answer
A) Explain why the cost approach was not used or given limited weight
Why this is correct: USPAP Standards Rule 2-2(a)(viii) requires that if a valuation approach is not used, the appraiser must explain the exclusion or the reason for giving it limited weight. This ensures methodological transparency. Why the other choices are wrong: "Include a brief cost approach analysis anyway" is not required if the approach is irrelevant. "State that the cost approach is not applicable to residential properties" is a blanket statement that may not be true. "Simply omit any reference to the cost approach" violates USPAP disclosure requirements. Exam tip: For any excluded approach, you must provide a reason. "Not applicable" is not enough; explain why.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because USPAP Standards Rule 2-2(a)(viii) explicitly requires appraisers to explain why any of the three approaches to value were excluded or given limited weight in the analysis. This transparency requirement ensures that report users understand the appraiser's methodology and reasoning. Simply omitting discussion of an approach without explanation would violate USPAP standards and leave report users without crucial information about the valuation process. The explanation helps establish the credibility and completeness of the appraisal analysis.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
The 'EEE' Rule
Remember 'EEE' - Exclude, Explain, Everything. When you Exclude an approach, you must Explain why, for Everything (all three approaches) in narrative reports.
How to use: When you see questions about omitting approaches in narrative reports, think 'EEE' - you can't just exclude without explaining. This reminds you that USPAP requires transparency in methodology decisions.
Exam Tip
Look for keywords like 'narrative report,' 'omitted approach,' or 'excluded approach' in questions - these often test USPAP Standards Rule 2-2 requirements for explanation and transparency.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Thinking you can simply omit approaches without explanation in narrative reports
- -Confusing requirements between narrative and form reports
- -Believing certain approaches never apply to specific property types
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests knowledge of USPAP Standards Rule 2-2 requirements for narrative appraisal reports, specifically regarding the transparency and completeness of methodology disclosure. The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice mandates that appraisers must provide clear reasoning for their valuation approach decisions, including explanations when standard approaches are excluded. This requirement ensures that users of appraisal reports can understand the appraiser's decision-making process and evaluate the credibility of the valuation conclusion. The rule applies to all three traditional approaches to value: sales comparison, cost, and income approaches.
Background Knowledge
USPAP Standards Rule 2-2 governs the content requirements for narrative appraisal reports, emphasizing transparency and completeness in methodology disclosure. The rule specifically addresses the three traditional approaches to value (sales comparison, cost, and income) and requires explanation when any approach is excluded or given limited weight.
Real-World Application
In practice, an appraiser valuing a 30-year-old residential property might exclude the cost approach due to difficulty in estimating accrued depreciation or lack of reliable cost data. The narrative report would include a section explaining that the cost approach was not used because the age of the improvements makes depreciation estimates unreliable, and the sales comparison approach provides more credible value indications for this property type and market.
More USPAP Questions
An appraiser is analyzing three comparable sales with the following data: Sale 1: $350,000 with +$10,000 adjustments; Sale 2: $340,000 with -$5,000 adjustments; Sale 3: $360,000 with -$15,000 adjustments. What are the adjusted sale prices?
A lender orders an appraisal for a $300,000 residential loan. After receiving the appraisal, the loan officer contacts the appraiser requesting that certain language be changed to better support the loan approval. This scenario represents a violation of:
How often must appraisers complete continuing education to maintain their license or certification?
Under FIRREA, which federal agency was given the authority to set minimum standards for real estate appraisers performing appraisals in federally related transactions?
How often must licensed and certified appraisers complete continuing education to maintain their credentials according to AQB requirements?
FIRREA was enacted primarily in response to which financial crisis?
In a narrative appraisal report, which section would typically contain the appraiser's analysis of highest and best use?
A narrative appraisal report for a commercial property must include detailed analysis of income, expenses, and capitalization rates. This level of detail is primarily required because:
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, which entity is responsible for establishing appraisal standards for federally related transactions?
In the URAR form, what does the appraiser indicate in the 'Subject' column for site size?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
