An appraiser is analyzing a 50-unit apartment building in a market where 600 units sold last year and 150 units are currently for sale. If the subject property has been on the market for 4 months, how does this compare to the expected marketing time?
Correct Answer
A) Marketing time is longer than expected (3 months expected)
Why this is correct: Monthly absorption is 600 ÷ 12 = 50 units. Expected marketing time is 150 ÷ 50 = 3 months. The subject’s 4 months is therefore one month longer than expected. Why the other choices are wrong: The other choices incorrectly call four months typical, replace the market-derived expectation with the subject’s exposure, or use an unsupported six-month estimate. Exam tip: Calculate market expectation first, then compare the subject’s actual exposure time.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
The correct answer is A, but there's an error in the explanation provided. The calculation shows expected marketing time is 3 months (150 ÷ 50 = 3), and the subject has been on market for 4 months, which is longer than expected. However, option A states 'Marketing time is typical' which contradicts this analysis. The correct interpretation should be that 4 months is longer than the 3-month expectation, making option B the logically correct choice based on the calculation.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
ICMA Formula
Remember 'I Can Make Assessments' - Inventory ÷ (Current sales ÷ Monthly periods) = Assessment of marketing time. Think of it as 'How long will current inventory last at the current pace of sales?'
How to use: When you see inventory and sales data, immediately think ICMA: take the current inventory number and divide by the monthly sales rate (annual sales ÷ 12) to get expected marketing time in months.
Exam Tip
Always convert annual sales to monthly sales by dividing by 12 before calculating marketing time. Double-check your division: inventory ÷ monthly absorption rate = months of inventory.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Forgetting to convert annual sales to monthly sales
- -Confusing the formula and dividing sales by inventory instead
- -Not recognizing that longer actual marketing time compared to expected indicates slower-than-typical market performance
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the appraiser's ability to calculate expected marketing time using market absorption analysis. Marketing time analysis compares current inventory levels to the rate of sales to determine how long properties typically remain on the market. The calculation involves dividing current inventory by the monthly absorption rate (annual sales divided by 12). This metric helps appraisers assess market conditions and determine if a subject property's marketing period is typical for the market. Understanding this relationship is crucial for market analysis and exposure time estimates in appraisal reports.
Background Knowledge
Marketing time analysis requires understanding the relationship between inventory levels and absorption rates in real estate markets. The formula is: Expected Marketing Time = Current Inventory ÷ Monthly Absorption Rate, where Monthly Absorption Rate = Annual Sales ÷ 12 months.
Real-World Application
Appraisers use this analysis to support exposure time estimates in appraisal reports, help clients understand market conditions, and determine if a property's time on market indicates pricing issues or normal market behavior.
More Market Questions
A residential subdivision has absorbed 120 units over the past 18 months. Based on this historical data, how long would it take to sell 80 remaining lots?
In neighborhood analysis, which factor would be considered an economic characteristic?
When delineating a market area for a single-family residence appraisal, which factor is MOST important?
In analyzing a special purpose property like a church, which approach to highest and best use is typically MOST appropriate?
In a balanced residential market, the typical months of supply would be:
In supply and demand analysis, which condition typically leads to increasing property values?
A retail property is currently operating as a restaurant but zoning allows for general commercial use. The restaurant generates $50,000 annual net income, while market analysis indicates retail use would generate $75,000. Renovation costs to convert would be $100,000. What is the highest and best use as improved?
A gas station on a corner lot in a gentrifying neighborhood continues to operate profitably but surrounding properties are being converted to upscale retail. This represents:
A property's highest and best use analysis shows that retail use would generate $50,000 annual net income, office use would generate $45,000, and residential use would generate $40,000. Using a 10% capitalization rate, what is the indicated value for retail use?
A comparable property sold 8 months ago for $450,000. Market analysis indicates property values have been appreciating at 6% annually. What is the time-adjusted sale price?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam