Two residential price segments in one market: over $1 million, 45 active listings and 3 sales per month; $500,000 to $1 million, 120 active listings and 20 sales per month. Which analytical concept calls for studying these price groups separately?
Correct Answer
B) Market segmentation
Luxury inventory is 45/3=15 months; the other segment is 120/20=6 months. These distinct price segments show different current sales/inventory relationships. The figures alone do not establish decline, equilibrium or saturation; each requires relevant market context.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because the two price segments show distinctly different sales and inventory relationships, about 15 months versus 6 months of inventory. Market segmentation calls for analyzing such submarkets separately so that one group's conditions do not distort the other's.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Supply-demand imbalance
Option A, supply-demand imbalance, may describe conditions within a segment, but it is not the concept that calls for studying the price groups separately. The figures alone also do not establish an imbalance without broader market context.
Option C: Neighborhood decline
Option C, neighborhood decline, is not supported by these figures. Current listings and sales by price range do not show a decline without trend data and other market context.
Option D: Market saturation
Option D, market saturation, is not established by the figures alone. Saturation requires evidence about total supply relative to demand over time, and it does not explain why the price groups should be studied separately.
Split before you sum
When groups behave differently, split them into segments before drawing conclusions, rather than summing them into one average.
How to use: Use this reminder when data shows sharply different results across price ranges or property types.
Exam Tip
Choose the concept that explains the method being used; conclusions like decline or saturation need more evidence than a single snapshot.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Blending all price ranges into one market conclusion
- -Concluding decline from a single period's inventory figures
- -Confusing segmentation with a supply-demand conclusion
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests recognizing when market data should be split into segments. The two price groups show very different relationships between listings and sales: 45 / 3 = 15 months of inventory above $1 million versus 120 / 20 = 6 months in the lower group. Studying them separately is market segmentation.
Background Knowledge
Market segmentation divides a market into groups of properties with similar characteristics and buyers, such as price range, property type or location. Different segments can be in different phases at the same time. Blending segments can mask conditions affecting the subject's actual competition.
Real-World Application
Appraising a $1.3 million home, an appraiser sees that the overall market shows about 7 months of supply, but homes over $1 million show about 15 months. She analyzes the luxury segment separately because that is where the subject's buyers and competition are.
More Market Questions
Market analysis confirms that seller financing at 3%, versus a 6% market rate, increased a comparable sale price. What adjustment removes that financing premium?
At the same effective date, reliable value indications support $800,000 for continued use of a property as improved and $500,000 for its cleared site. Immediate demolition costs $100,000. These are the only feasible alternatives, with no other costs or timing differences. Which alternative has the higher net value?
Other relevant conditions equal, growth in the number of households with effective purchasing power in a market tends to have which effect?
In a lakefront market, paired sales show that direct water frontage has the largest price effect of any feature. Which approach to comparable selection best follows from this evidence?
Which circumstance can cause highest and best use as improved to differ from highest and best use as though vacant?
A small group of buyers in a market looks for specialized features that are uncommon in the broader housing supply. What term describes this group?
A neighborhood analysis should include all of the following EXCEPT:
A site legally permits at most 40 units and can physically support 50. Supported comparable analyses find 30 and 40 units financially feasible, with 40 units producing the highest net land value after costs, timing and required return. Which use is maximally productive among these alternatives?
Market evidence isolates a subject value loss from off-site landfill odors. Which listed cause is an external-obsolescence influence?
Which proposed use cannot pass the legal-permissibility screen without evidence that the necessary permission is reasonably probable?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
For a waterfront subject, an adjacent waterfront neighborhood is verified competitive. The 18 month-old same-street sale needs an unsupported time adjustment after sharp market movement. The recent same-street sale is substantially larger with an unsupported size adjustment. Which listed sale is the best-supported initial candidate, assuming its other material differences are adequately supported?
Next Question
When analyzing a neighborhood, which characteristic would MOST likely indicate a declining area?