A comparable sale had seller financing with a below-market interest rate that saved the buyer approximately $15,000 in present value. How should this be treated in the sales comparison approach?
Correct Answer
C) Adjust the comparable downward by $15,000
Why this is correct: Favorable financing (like a below-market interest rate) is a condition of sale that typically inflates the sale price. To make the comparable equivalent to a cash or typically financed sale, the price must be adjusted downward by the estimated value of the financing concession. Why the other choices are wrong: 'Adjust the comparable upward by $15,000' would make the comparable seem even more expensive, which is the opposite of correcting for the concession. 'No adjustment needed' ignores a material difference in transaction terms. 'Exclude the comparable from analysis' is unnecessary if the concession can be quantified and adjusted for. Exam tip: Favorable terms inflate price; adjust the comparable DOWN to a cash-equivalent price.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because favorable financing inflates the sale price above what it would have been with market-rate financing. Since the buyer saved $15,000 in present value through below-market financing, they likely paid approximately $15,000 more for the property than they would have with conventional financing. To make this comparable useful for valuing the subject property (which presumably will have market-rate financing), we must adjust the sale price downward by $15,000 to reflect what it would have sold for under typical financing conditions.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
The Financing Flip Rule
Remember 'FLIP': Favorable financing = Lower the comparable price, Inferior financing = Price goes up. If the financing helped the buyer (favorable), flip it down. If the financing hurt the buyer (above market rates), flip it up.
How to use: When you see a financing adjustment question, identify if the financing was favorable or unfavorable to the buyer, then FLIP the adjustment in the opposite direction to normalize the comparable.
Exam Tip
Always read financing adjustment questions carefully to identify the direction of the benefit - if financing saved the buyer money, adjust the comparable price downward by that amount.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Confusing the direction of adjustment - thinking favorable financing should increase the comparable price
- -Ignoring financing adjustments entirely when they significantly impact sale prices
- -Applying the adjustment to the subject property instead of the comparable sale
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests understanding of financing adjustments in the sales comparison approach, specifically how favorable seller financing affects comparable sales prices. When a seller provides below-market interest rate financing, buyers are willing to pay a premium for the property because they're receiving a financial benefit through reduced borrowing costs. The sales comparison approach requires adjusting comparables to reflect what they would have sold for under typical market conditions, including standard financing terms. The $15,000 present value savings represents the premium the buyer paid above market value to obtain the favorable financing.
Background Knowledge
The sales comparison approach requires all comparables to be adjusted to reflect the same financing conditions as the subject property. When comparables have non-typical financing (seller financing, below-market rates, cash sales, etc.), adjustments must be made to normalize the data. Favorable financing terms typically result in higher sale prices because buyers capitalize the financing benefit into the purchase price.
Real-World Application
In practice, appraisers frequently encounter seller-financed sales, especially in markets where buyers have difficulty obtaining conventional financing. These sales often occur at premium prices, and appraisers must adjust them downward to reflect market value under typical financing conditions when appraising properties that will use conventional loans.
More Sales Comparison Questions
A residential subdivision has absorbed 120 units over the past 18 months. Based on this historical data, how long would it take to sell 80 remaining lots?
In neighborhood analysis, which factor would be considered an economic characteristic?
When delineating a market area for a single-family residence appraisal, which factor is MOST important?
In analyzing a special purpose property like a church, which approach to highest and best use is typically MOST appropriate?
In a balanced residential market, the typical months of supply would be:
In supply and demand analysis, which condition typically leads to increasing property values?
A retail property is currently operating as a restaurant but zoning allows for general commercial use. The restaurant generates $50,000 annual net income, while market analysis indicates retail use would generate $75,000. Renovation costs to convert would be $100,000. What is the highest and best use as improved?
A gas station on a corner lot in a gentrifying neighborhood continues to operate profitably but surrounding properties are being converted to upscale retail. This represents:
A property's highest and best use analysis shows that retail use would generate $50,000 annual net income, office use would generate $45,000, and residential use would generate $40,000. Using a 10% capitalization rate, what is the indicated value for retail use?
A comparable property sold 8 months ago for $450,000. Market analysis indicates property values have been appreciating at 6% annually. What is the time-adjusted sale price?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
A property currently operates as a restaurant but is zoned for residential use only. In the highest and best use analysis, this property fails which test?
Next Question
A neighborhood analysis reveals that 65% of recent buyers are first-time homebuyers aged 25-35 with household incomes between $75,000-$100,000. This information is MOST useful for: