EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateAntitrustMEDIUM

Which of the following activities would constitute an antitrust violation in Oklahoma real estate?

Correct Answer

B) Competing brokers agreeing among themselves to charge a standard commission rate

Price-fixing — where competing brokers agree to charge the same commission rates — violates the Sherman Antitrust Act. Each broker must independently set their own fees based on their own business judgment. Competing independently, offering discounts, and sharing listings through an MLS are all lawful activities. Antitrust violations in real estate can result in federal criminal prosecution, substantial fines, and civil liability.

Answer Options
A
Competing brokers independently setting their own commission rates
B
Competing brokers agreeing among themselves to charge a standard commission rate
C
A broker offering discounted services to attract new clients
D
Brokers sharing listing information through a Multiple Listing Service (MLS)

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Related Topics:

Sherman Antitrust ActMarket allocationGroup boycottsMLS rules and regulationsOklahoma antitrust statutes

Key Terms:

price-fixingSherman Antitrust Actantitrustcommission ratesmarket allocation

Related Concepts

Broker supervision is the legal obligation of a designated or managing broker to oversee and be accountable for the real estate activities of all salespersons and associate brokers operating under their license.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds, while conversion is the unauthorized use of client funds for the broker's own benefit. Both are serious violations that can result in license revocation.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client trust funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds; conversion is the misappropriation of those funds.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing