EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair_housingHARD

A property management company in Seattle implements a 'criminal background screening policy' that automatically disqualifies any applicant with any criminal conviction, regardless of the nature or age of the conviction. A prospective tenant with a decade-old misdemeanor conviction for a non-violent offense is rejected. The tenant is also a member of a racial minority group. Under Seattle's local ordinances and applicable fair housing guidance, which analysis best describes the legal risk of this policy?

Correct Answer

D) The policy may be unlawful under a disparate impact theory if it disproportionately excludes members of a protected racial class, and Seattle's Fair Chance Housing Ordinance further restricts the use of criminal history in tenant screening

Seattle has enacted a Fair Chance Housing Ordinance (SMC 14.09) that significantly restricts landlords' ability to use criminal history in tenant screening. The ordinance generally prohibits landlords from inquiring about or taking adverse action based on criminal history during the initial screening process, with limited exceptions for certain serious offenses. Beyond the local ordinance, HUD guidance and fair housing case law recognize that blanket criminal history exclusion policies can violate the Fair Housing Act under a disparate impact theory if they disproportionately screen out applicants of a particular race or national origin — because arrest and conviction rates are not racially neutral. A policy that automatically disqualifies any applicant with any conviction, regardless of age or nature, is particularly vulnerable to both the Seattle ordinance and disparate impact challenges.

Answer Options
A
The policy may be unlawful only if the tenant can prove the landlord specifically intended to discriminate based on race
B
The policy is lawful because criminal history is not a protected class under RCW 49.60 or Seattle's ordinances
C
The policy is lawful because landlords have an absolute right to screen for criminal history to protect other tenants and the property
D
The policy may be unlawful under a disparate impact theory if it disproportionately excludes members of a protected racial class, and Seattle's Fair Chance Housing Ordinance further restricts the use of criminal history in tenant screening

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

fair_housingseattlefair_chance_housingcriminal_historydisparate_impactracetenant_screeninglocal_ordinance

Related Concepts

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

A trust account, also called an escrow account, is a separate bank account maintained by a broker to hold funds belonging to others, such as earnest money deposits, security deposits, or other client funds.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing