EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair_housingHARD

A landlord with rental properties in Seattle is reviewing tenant screening policies. All of the following screening criteria would likely constitute unlawful discrimination under Seattle's local ordinances or Washington State's RCW 49.60 EXCEPT:

Correct Answer

D) Requiring a minimum credit score of 650 for all applicants

Requiring a minimum credit score of 650 applied uniformly to all applicants is a facially neutral, legitimate financial screening criterion that does not target any protected class on its face. While such a policy could potentially give rise to a disparate impact claim if it disproportionately affects a protected class, as stated in this question, a uniform credit score requirement is the screening criterion least likely to constitute unlawful discrimination on its own. It is the exception the question asks for.

Answer Options
A
Refusing to rent to an honorably discharged military veteran
B
Refusing all applicants who use Section 8 housing vouchers
C
Rejecting an applicant because they use a trained guide dog for a visual impairment
D
Requiring a minimum credit score of 650 for all applicants

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

fair_housingscreening_criteriaseattlercw_49_60reverse_questioncredit_scoresource_of_income

Related Concepts

Antitrust violations in real estate occur when competing brokerages or agents engage in practices that restrain trade, reduce competition, or harm consumers through collusion. These violations are governed by the Sherman Antitrust Act and can result in severe penalties.

Broker supervision is the legal obligation of a designated or managing broker to oversee and be accountable for the real estate activities of all salespersons and associate brokers operating under their license.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds, while conversion is the unauthorized use of client funds for the broker's own benefit. Both are serious violations that can result in license revocation.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing