EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair_housingMEDIUM

James, a Washington licensee, is working with a buyer who uses a wheelchair. The buyer is interested in a second-floor condominium unit. James tells the buyer, 'That unit probably won't work for you — let me only show you ground-floor units.' The buyer did not ask James to limit the search. Which fair housing principle has James most likely violated?

Correct Answer

B) James violated the federal Fair Housing Act by steering the buyer based on disability, a federally protected class

Disability is a federally protected class under the Fair Housing Act. By unilaterally deciding to limit the buyer's housing options based on the buyer's disability (wheelchair use), James engaged in steering — directing the buyer away from certain properties based on a protected characteristic. Even if well-intentioned, this conduct violates federal fair housing law. The buyer has the right to decide which properties to consider; the licensee's role is to present options and let the buyer choose.

Answer Options
A
James violated the prohibition against blockbusting by inducing panic based on the buyer's disability
B
James violated the federal Fair Housing Act by steering the buyer based on disability, a federally protected class
C
James acted appropriately because he was looking out for the buyer's best interests as a client
D
James violated Washington's community property rules by not consulting the buyer's spouse

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

disability_discriminationsteeringfederal_fair_housingbuyer_representation

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing