EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair_housingMEDIUM

A property management company in Charlottesville, Virginia has a policy of requiring all applicants to provide a Social Security number and refusing applications from anyone who cannot provide one. A prospective tenant who is a lawful permanent resident but does not have a Social Security number is rejected. Under Virginia's Fair Housing Law, this policy most likely constitutes discrimination based on which protected class?

Correct Answer

A) National origin, because the policy disproportionately affects foreign-born individuals

A blanket policy requiring a Social Security number that effectively excludes lawful permanent residents and other non-citizens can constitute disparate impact discrimination based on national origin, which is protected under both the federal Fair Housing Act and Virginia's Fair Housing Law (Va. Code § 36-96.1 et seq.). The policy disproportionately affects individuals from other countries who may not have Social Security numbers.

Answer Options
A
National origin, because the policy disproportionately affects foreign-born individuals
B
Source of funds, because the applicant cannot access certain payment systems
C
Military status, because some military personnel lack standard documentation
D
Elderliness, because older immigrants may lack documentation

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

fair_housingnational_origindisparate_impactdocumentation_policystate_federal

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing