EstatePass
Tx Fair Housing DtpaDtpa_consumer_protectionMEDIUM

A homebuyer in San Antonio sues a seller under the DTPA for failing to disclose a persistent plumbing issue. The seller argues the failure was an honest oversight, not intentional deception. Under the DTPA, does the buyer still have a valid claim?

Correct Answer

B) Yes, because the DTPA does not require proof of intent—a producing cause of actual damages resulting from a laundry list violation is sufficient

Under the Texas DTPA (Business & Commerce Code §17.50(a)), a consumer does not need to prove the defendant's intent or knowledge to establish a basic DTPA claim. The consumer must only show that the defendant's conduct was a producing cause of actual damages. Intent becomes relevant only for the damages multiplier—knowing conduct allows treble damages, while unintentional violations allow only actual damages.

Answer Options
A
No, because the DTPA requires proof of intentional fraud to establish liability
B
Yes, because the DTPA does not require proof of intent—a producing cause of actual damages resulting from a laundry list violation is sufficient
C
No, because negligent misrepresentation is not actionable under the DTPA
D
Yes, but only if the buyer can prove the seller had actual knowledge of the defect

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Tx Fair Housing Dtpa Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Tx Fair Housing Dtpa

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Tx Fair Housing Dtpa

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Tx Fair Housing Dtpa Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

dtpaproducing_causeintent_not_requiredactual_damages

Related Concepts

Market allocation is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to divide markets among themselves by geographic area, property type, or price range, thereby eliminating competition.

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Tx Fair Housing Dtpa Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing