EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair HousingHARD

A fair housing tester poses as a prospective buyer and contacts a Memphis real estate firm. The tester, who is Black, is told that no listings are available in a desirable suburban neighborhood, while a white tester who contacts the same firm the same day is shown multiple listings in that neighborhood. The firm argues that because the tester never intended to actually purchase property, no real harm occurred and no fair housing violation exists. Under Tennessee and federal fair housing law, which statement best evaluates the firm's argument?

Correct Answer

D) The firm's argument is invalid because fair housing testing is a recognized enforcement tool and testers have standing to file complaints.

Fair housing testing is a well-established and legally recognized enforcement tool under both the federal Fair Housing Act and Tennessee's Human Rights Act. The U.S. Supreme Court confirmed in Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman (1982) that testers have standing to bring fair housing complaints because the act of providing false information to a tester itself constitutes a violation of the Fair Housing Act. Tennessee's THRC recognizes testing evidence as valid in fair housing investigations. The firm's argument that no 'real harm' occurred because the tester did not intend to buy is legally incorrect.

Answer Options
A
The firm's argument is valid because a tester lacks standing to bring a fair housing complaint since no actual purchase was intended.
B
The firm's argument is valid because only actual buyers who suffered financial loss can demonstrate a fair housing violation.
C
The firm's argument is invalid only if the tester was an agent of a government agency, not a private fair housing organization.
D
The firm's argument is invalid because fair housing testing is a recognized enforcement tool and testers have standing to file complaints.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

fair_housing_testingtester_standingracial_discriminationenforcement_toolssteering

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing