EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateState SpecificHARD

Tom, a buyer relocating from Georgia, is under contract to purchase a 320-acre irrigated farm in South Dakota. His buyer's agent, Sandra, is also originally from Georgia and assumes that, as in her home state, water rights automatically follow the land. Sandra does not investigate or disclose the status of the seller's water appropriation permit, and the purchase agreement makes no mention of water rights. At closing, Tom discovers the seller has not transferred the water permit and plans to retain it for use on adjacent property he is keeping. Which of the following most accurately describes the legal and professional consequences of this situation under South Dakota law?

Correct Answer

A) Sandra has committed a material omission and may face disciplinary action under SDCL Chapter 36-21A, because water rights are a separate property interest that must be addressed in South Dakota agricultural transactions

Under South Dakota's prior appropriation doctrine (SDCL Chapter 46-1 through 46-6), surface water rights are a separate property interest that does not automatically transfer with the land. Sandra's failure to investigate and disclose the status of the seller's water appropriation permit — particularly on an irrigated farm where water access is essential to the property's utility and value — constitutes a material omission. This exposes Sandra to disciplinary action under SDCL Chapter 36-21A, which governs licensee conduct and prohibits misrepresentation and material omissions. The fact that Sandra was unfamiliar with South Dakota's prior appropriation system because of her Georgia background does not excuse the violation — licensees are expected to know the laws of the state in which they practice.

Answer Options
A
Sandra has committed a material omission and may face disciplinary action under SDCL Chapter 36-21A, because water rights are a separate property interest that must be addressed in South Dakota agricultural transactions
B
Sandra has no liability because the seller's attorney was responsible for identifying all property interests included in the sale
C
Tom's only remedy is to rescind the contract, as South Dakota law does not allow buyers to seek damages when water rights are omitted from a purchase agreement
D
Sandra acted appropriately because Georgia's riparian rights rules apply to Tom as a Georgia resident purchasing property, making water rights automatically part of the land transfer

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

prior_appropriationwater_rightsmaterial_omissionbuyer_agent_dutydisciplinary_actionsdcl_36_21aagricultural_propertyexpert_trap

Related Concepts

FREC has the authority to impose fines and other disciplinary actions on licensees who violate real estate laws and rules.

A group boycott is an illegal antitrust practice in which two or more competing real estate businesses agree to refuse to work with a specific person, company, or entity in order to harm that party's ability to compete.

In real estate, the distinction between an independent contractor and an employee determines tax treatment, liability, and the level of control a broker may exercise over the agent's daily activities. Most real estate agents operate as independent contractors.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing