EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair_housingMEDIUM

Marcus, an Oklahoma real estate broker, is reviewing the remedies and procedures available when a fair housing complaint is filed under the Oklahoma Fair Housing Act (Title 25 O.S. §§ 1451–1466). Which of the following is NOT an available enforcement mechanism or remedy under Oklahoma's state fair housing enforcement process?

Correct Answer

C) Requesting automatic license revocation through OREC without a separate disciplinary hearing

Automatic license revocation through OREC without a separate disciplinary hearing is NOT an available remedy under the Oklahoma Fair Housing Act. While a fair housing violation by a licensee can ultimately lead to OREC discipline, that process requires a separate disciplinary proceeding under Title 59 O.S. §§ 858-100 et seq. with proper notice and hearing rights—there is no mechanism for automatic revocation simply upon filing or finding a fair housing complaint.

Answer Options
A
Filing a complaint with the Oklahoma Human Rights Commission for investigation
B
Pursuing a private civil lawsuit in Oklahoma district court for damages
C
Requesting automatic license revocation through OREC without a separate disciplinary hearing
D
Referring the matter to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for federal enforcement

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

fair_housingenforcementremediesorec_disciplinehuman_rights_commissionreverse_question

Related Concepts

Market allocation is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to divide markets among themselves by geographic area, property type, or price range, thereby eliminating competition.

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing